Quoted from ForceFlow:Honestly, I can see both points of view.
On one hand, the seller is saying they worked, so the buyer owes him.
On the other hand, the buyer is saying it was implied that the EPROMs were one-of-a-kind (thus valuable), but they are not one-of-a-kind and are already freely available (and therefore not valuable).
Compromise on $250?
so after reading through the entire thread between the two, do you still think a compromise is fair?