I'm with RGR on this one - i think games should be set up super tough for major tournamnets. That way, it makes players have to be adaptable. There are some players who regularly do quite well, who typically play quite rough (lots of hard slapping and constant moving the machine - not abusing it), but when they get to a tight tilt game, they turn to custard. That to me, is not a top level player - that player should be adaptable. Play a new stern, and 90s, and EM and undstand the differences in phyiscs, bounce etc. The player should look to see if outlanes are mega wide, or even if lightning flippers installed etc and adapt thier play style appropraitely - maybe go for safe return to flipper shots than go for the 'blow the score up strategy'.
While i've said the above from the perspective of ensuring the best all round skilled player is rewarded, i also think it goes a long way for the viewers and fellow competitors. No-one wants to watch a 1 hour long epic on LOTR, however the one at Brisbane Masters last year was set up brutally hard and it worked - Good scores were over 5 or 6M, many were aroudn 1-2M.