Quoted from Quiddity:

I need more information before I tar and feather him... Two counts seems like a really small number if he's really some secret kiddie porn lover. I mean... his HD's could have 17k images and another 15k pornographic videos on them, and out of that huge number there's only TWO things that warrant him being charged over? I know, I know, 'Merica. Just seems ridiculous that someone's life is potentially going to be ruined and it could boil down to him downloading two images that he thought were legal.

Quoted from Frax:

It's not acceptable to be a [removed] and distort what someone else said either. There wasn't any question of that. Stop being dumb. Thanks.

Quoted from Quiddity:

Too much ambiguity in the law for me to agree with that. Examples? Eighteen year old kid takes consensual pictures of him/herself with their sixteen year old girlfriend. http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/07/sexting.busts/ Two sixteen year olds in North Carolina takes pictures and video of themselves and the files are found on one of their phones. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/09/21/n-c-just-prosecuted-a-teenage-couple-for-making-child-porn-of-themselves/?utm_term=.8756a769e761
Given the choice, I'd personally define child porn as any non-consensual image/video taken, with the caveat that ability to consent legally being dependent on the age involved. If the legal system is going to charge a fifteen or sixteen year old as an adult with a crime, then they should have the legal ability to consent to pornography.