Catching up this morning. I'm wondering what may have been reported awhile ago and how long the investigation has been going on. Does anyone know of Trudeau's past and what children were under his care?

I try to see some silver lining and think that maybe there was just a perverse curiosity, but no. Those that are even remotely interested in this trash want to do more than just look. Looking at children in this way may be a sickness but it is too dangerous to have in society. That old post suggests he most likely acted on his impulses.

I understand the reaction to Steve's post. It was not well thought out, it may have come from a lot of confused feelings. Maybe he thought about it and came to the same conclusion and deleted it? Maybe Stern asked him to and not to comment on the situation. I won't try to read someone's thoughts after one comment.

Let's let everyone catch their breaths. One bad seed does not paint pinball, Stern or anyone else in a bad light.

Look at what happened to Fogel. Not that I feel bad.

While I totally agree that everyone should be presumed innocent when going to trial I do think it is entirely reasonable for someone to draw some conclusions from the facts. We do have an old post alleging some past indiscretion. The police did not randomly knock on his door. There had to be evidence to secure a warrant which most likely included monitoring by authorities. To the extent of what was on the computers will most likely be known if this comes to trial. I'm going to assume a level of "not quite innocence" here.