(Topic ID: 196539)

Just came across this... (news about John Trudeau)

By bangerjay

6 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 1,376 posts
  • 361 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 6 years ago by robin
  • Topic is favorited by 26 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    image (resized).jpeg
    John-Trudeau-signs-first-Ghostbusters-flyer (resized).jpg
    trudeaurighthanded (resized).jpg
    IMG_2410 (resized).JPG
    IMG_2408 (resized).JPG
    untitled1-300x232 (resized).jpg
    bettyboopangel (resized).png
    pasted_image (resized).png
    oj (resized).jpg
    pez SIJ (resized).jpg
    noting (resized).png
    i like to play a little game (resized).jpg
    dude (resized).jpg
    imagesASDNT90Q (resized).jpg
    more witches (resized).jpg
    Trudeau-court (resized).jpg

    This topic is closed.

    There are 1,376 posts in this topic. You are on page 18 of 28.
    #851 6 years ago
    Quoted from jlm33:

    ... and no need to advertise this podcast...

    Yeah, I was not going to say anything until someone linked to his thoughts on the Aussie forum. I do not listen to his podcast as a rule.

    #852 6 years ago

    Maybe SR was in denial or thought it was an error like mistaken identity and that's why he posted..

    This football player got fired because of a mistaken identity crime and the fen Cowboys would not even consider that they made the wrong decision.

    IMG_0028 (resized).PNGIMG_0028 (resized).PNG

    #853 6 years ago
    Quoted from rai:

    Was reading about Jerry Sandusky and he's not allowed contact with other prisoners because well that's why.

    Look at what happened to Fogel. Not that I feel bad.

    #854 6 years ago

    Personally, even though I have a very intense dislike of Ritchie, my opinion is that people should just leave him out of this. He's not the kind of guy that strikes me as NORMALLY willing to cover up or mince things he's said previously, so the fact that he thought the post was worth deleting should say quite a lot in my opinion. I know I personally only ever delete things I've said when I feel like I've really screwed up. You can't fault the guy for having a moment of clarity and then resolving it as he saw fit.

    #855 6 years ago
    Quoted from flynnibus:

    Sorry, there used to be something known as RESTRAINT in our culture. AKA, don't just spew garbage with no restraint or remorse.. and then expect the world to give you a free pass when you come back afterwards and try to crawl back with excuses. This type of behavior is part of what got him banned in the first place. It's deplorable behavior that shouldn't be welcomed or tolerated anywhere. It's a big part of the negative side of this community where people think raging is fine... as long as you come back later and ask for forgiveness (and then repeat the cycle). No.
    Think before you speak.. if not, own the consequences.

    Thank you.

    At another time, Ill share some of my last 6 months work into socio/political forum research I have been doing for a friend.

    #856 6 years ago

    What Steve did was very stupid. He made a mistake I can accept that but in this day and age posting something like that on social media is not ok. He has to expect and accept he is going to take some heat for it. I'm sure he will be fine and things will move on. Stern needs to educate their employees. I think it's fair to say these guys are a little older and didn't grow up with this kind of media. I can tell you this, if someone at the company I worked for posted something like that, their job would be in serious jeopardy. At the very least there would be a very sincere apology made publicly. They could easily be fired. That being said we all have to take social media awareness courses and know exactly what we can say and the legal issues around it. I can give Steve a pass he fucked up and I am sure he realizes that now. I can also understand why some people expect a statement and apology.

    P.S. Kaneda is clearly trolling for clicks my post has nothing to do with that mess.

    11
    #857 6 years ago

    Ugh. Just finished reading this and now I feel like I need a shower. Some of the posts on here are repulsive.

    First thing I've read from him in quite awhile. So glad he's gone.

    #858 6 years ago
    Quoted from cdnpinballer:

    manimal - How would have the charges been different? JT has been charged with 2 counts of CP... Jared was also charged with 2 counts - the first for distribution and possession and the second for travelling to solicit minors for sex. JT has been charged with 2 counts as well. If it was just distribution/possession of CP that would be one count but there is a second charge laid so there must be more to the story than just distribution/possession such as in the Jared case.

    They are immensely different. Offenses such as distribution, soliciting, travelling, wire transmission, etc all carry a lot heavier penalties because they further the criminal enterprise and have physical victims. In Jared's case, the actual charges may have been reduced to only 2 as part of his plea, but I guarantee the judge was aware of that and sentenced according to the crime and not necessarily just the charges. In JT's case, he is at this point only charged with 2 counts of possession, which is the lowest category. Maybe the victim was 17 instead of 2 and sent him the pictures herself? I am not saying that makes it right, but all of it does come into consideration as to how he will be prosecuted and ultimately sentenced if convicted.

    One thing folks need to keep in mind is that it was not all that many years ago when a 18 year old girl was considered a spinster. Marriages at a very young age were common, and that is still a practice in many parts of the world. Again, I am not defending anything or anyone, I am just saying we don't know what he was actually in possession of, and morality does seem to change over time with the social norms.

    #859 6 years ago
    Quoted from practicalsteve:

    ... Kanedas inflammatory and accusatory podast...

    Isn't that kinda like the "Department of Redundancy Department"?

    #860 6 years ago
    Quoted from Manimal:

    They are immensely different. Offenses such as distribution, soliciting, travelling, wire transmission, etc all carry a lot heavier penalties because they further the criminal enterprise and have physical victims. In Jared's case, the actual charges may have been reduced to only 2 as part of his plea, but I guarantee the judge was a ware of that and sentenced according to the crime and not necessarily just the charges. In JT's case, he is at this point only charged with 2 counts of possession, which is the lowest category. Maybe the victim was 17 instead of 2 and sent him the pictures herself? I am not saying that makes it right, but all of it does come into consideration as to how he will be prosecuted and ultimately sentenced if convicted.
    One thing folks need to keep in mind is that it was not all that many years ago when a 18 year old girl was considered a spinster. Marriages at a very young age were common, and that is still a practice in many parts of the world. Again, I am not defending anything or anyone, I am just saying we don't know what he was actually in possession of, and morality does seem to change over time with the social norms.

    Sorry but the whole she was 17 and looked older thing is as plausible as the tainted supplements defense in athletes getting caught for steroids.

    #861 6 years ago
    Quoted from Darscot:

    Sorry but the whole she was 17 and looked older thing is as plausible as the tainted supplements defense in athletes getting caught for steroids.

    Then it's perfectly plausible because I've manufactured supplements and the level of ingredient integrity for them is damn near zero. Case in point, look at the advertising Alex Jones has on his website.

    34
    #862 6 years ago
    Quoted from Darscot:

    Sorry but the whole she was 17 and looked older thing is as plausible as the tainted supplements defense in athletes getting caught for steroids.

    Read one of my earlier posts and then come back with the same opinion. I was a cop for a long time and worked child crimes for over 2 years. I have seen a lot of things that make you question everything about people and common decency that you thought you knew, and I would love nothing better to go back to my rookie days when I had the luxury of seeing things in black and white. It would make life so much easier. But instead I have learned that very few situations are actually that cut and dried, and most things are not what they seem.

    What would you do if a 17 year old person who admired you from afar, sent you nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves and maybe even propositioned you? What if they were all dolled up and looked much older than what they were? Would you be flattered and keep the photos? Would you show them to your buddies? At what point would you know they were technically child pornography? I am not talking of a 6 year old here, and don't get me wrong, this is all disgusting....I am just asking how you would know and how you would react. What if the police showed up on your door before you even had a chance to delete them? You are in possession, but are you guilty?What if you accidentally clicked on an illegal site? Do you clear your cache and format your hard drive? If not, then those pictures are probably still on your hard drive. Are you a child pornographer? What if you copied a picture of a nude girl from a website that was considered perfectly legal art, and you found out later she was under 18? If you had any thoughts other than disgust, does that make you a pervert? What if you show that "artful" image to a friend and lake a lewd comment...does that now take you from appreciating art to being a child predator?

    All I am trying to say here is if he is guilty, he deserves the book thrown at him. But our system is based on the premise that a person is innocent until PROVEN guilty. It is why the country is so great. Yes, there are all kinds of injustices that we can bring up, but the basic rule of justice usually prevails in the end. We all here know NOTHING of this case other than that fact he was arrested and charged. We don't know the evidence, we don't know the circumstances, and there isn't a one of us here that wouldn't be screaming from the top of our lungs for people to stop jumping to conclusions if the tables were turned. He needs to have his day in court before we all sentence him to the gallows. I will agree none of this looks good for him, but we are now over 800 posts of pure speculation.

    #863 6 years ago
    Quoted from Manimal:

    Read one of my earlier posts and then come back with the same opinion. I was a cop for a long time and worked child crimes for over 2 years. I have seen a lot of things that make you question everything about people and common decency that you thought you knew. I would love nothing better to go back to my rookie days when I had the luxury of seeing things in black and white. It would make life so much easier. But instead I have learned that very few things are actually that cut and dried, and many times things are not what they seem. What would you do if a 17 year old person who admired you from afar, sent you nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves and maybe even propositioned you? What if they were all dolled up and looked much older than what they were? Would you be flattered and keep the photos? Would you show them to your buddies? At what point would you know they were technically child pornography? I am not taking of a 6 year old here, and don't get me wrong, this is all disgusting....I am just asking how you would know and how you would react. What if you accidentally clicked on an illegal site? Do you clear your cache and format your hard drive? If not, then those pictures are probably still on your hard drive. Are you responsible for that? What if you copied a picture of a nude girl from a website that was considered perfectly legal art, and you found out later she was under 18? If you had any thoughts other than disgust, does that make you a pervert?
    All I am trying to say here is if he is guilty, he deserves the book thrown at him. But our system is based on the premise that a person is innocent until PROVEN guilty. It is why the country is so great. Yes, there are all kinds of injustices that we can bring up, but the basic rule of justice usually prevails in the end. We all here no NOTHING of this case other than that fact he was arrested and charged. We don't know the evidence, we don't know the circumstances, and there isn't a one of us here that wouldn't be screaming from the top of our lungs for people to stop jumping to conclusions if the tables were turned. He needs to have his day in court before we all sentence him to the gallows. I will agree none of this looks good for him, but we are now over 800 pages of pure speculation.

    How much time do you think they waste on the 17 year old girl cases when they are swamped with far more serious crimes against children. I find it hard to believe 17 year old girl are send JT nudies, he is not Beiber.

    Also I'm 45 if anyone sent me a nude I would address it. A young girl I would inform the authorities immediately.

    #864 6 years ago
    Quoted from Darscot:

    How much time do you think they waste on the 17 year old girl cases when they are swamped with far more serious crimes against children. I find it hard to believe 17 year old girl are send JT nudies, he is not Beiber.

    Hahahaha....That is for sure. But I wasn't saying that is what happened. You were commenting how you don't but the whole "she is 17 but looked 18 thing". I am just saying things are just not that black and white in the real world. I was commenting on your statement, not what happened to JT.

    I have seen guys who I felt were innocent, convicted because of really shoddy evidence and a mob mentality. I always ask myself how I would react if I were them. We are all 1 accusation away from being in the same shoes he is. And to that you say, "well if I am innocent, I have nothing to be afraid of"........but we have no idea if JT is guilty of anything, and he has 800 posts of something to be afraid of.

    #865 6 years ago
    Quoted from Kevin_LHeureux:

    The comment on my website is not clickbait and completely legit time-wise and was in fact something that I saw when it was posted in my news blog in 2013.

    Thank you for verifying that fact.

    Do you still have the IP records on who posted it?

    Quoted from Kevin_LHeureux:

    Vid, we had talked previously and you had even provided some content for my website in the rest tips section if I recall correctly.

    Always at your service.

    Vid

    67
    #866 6 years ago
    Quoted from Darscot:

    Also I'm 45 if anyone sent me a nude I would address it.

    PM sent.

    #869 6 years ago

    Your always good for comic relief

    #870 6 years ago

    good one boob

    #872 6 years ago

    Wow that's crazy

    and really sad at the same time

    #873 6 years ago

    I'll have one too please

    #874 6 years ago
    Quoted from waspinat0r:

    I'll have one too please

    I won't have what he's having lol

    #875 6 years ago
    Quoted from jlm33:

    ... and no need to advertise this podcast...

    I know, right?! Opinions on a podcast... so yucky! So criminal!

    Let's get back to more juicy gossip talk about the kiddie porn guy!

    #876 6 years ago
    Quoted from Slim64:

    I won't have what he's having lol

    Me either! Just imagine the boob in the nude!

    #877 6 years ago
    Quoted from Manimal:

    What would you do if a 17 year old person who admired you from afar, sent you nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves and maybe even propositioned you? What if they were all dolled up and looked much older than what they were? Would you be flattered and keep the photos? Would you show them to your buddies? At what point would you know they were technically child pornography?

    Like you retired police officer and I agree with you, but as statics do show us these sick bastards are not looking at girls who are 17 even maybe 16 that play them self's off for 20+ year old for the simple reason that hey look too much like adult women and they won't be stimulating for them to satisfy their disgusting habits. In addition now that we know that the comment from 2013 blog was indeed real, that troubles me even more so as an investigator.

    #878 6 years ago
    Quoted from waspinat0r:

    I'll have one too please

    You would just sell it a week later.

    #879 6 years ago
    Quoted from beelzeboob:

    You would just sell it a week later.

    Let's be fair, it'd be gone in a couple days if I could find the right trade.

    #880 6 years ago
    Quoted from waspinat0r:

    Let's be fair, it'd be gone in a couple days if I could find the right trade.

    Please, you'll be stuck with it for years.

    12
    #881 6 years ago
    Quoted from DeathHimself:

    Like you retired police officer and I agree with you, but as statics do show us these sick bastards are not looking at girls who are 17 even maybe 16 that play them self's off for 20+ year old for the simple reason that hey look too much like adult women and they won't be stimulating for them to satisfy their disgusting habits. In addition now that we know that the comment from 2013 blog was indeed real, that troubles me even more so as an investigator.

    I agree with what you say, but the comment about the 17 year old was just to make a point. How many times did you work a case where you were immediately convinced a guy was guilty, but then the case ended up taking a 180 degree turn and you find out it was someone else? All I am saying is he deserves his day in court and people should stop making assumptions and hear the facts first. Experience would tell me there is a lot more going on here than meets the eye, especially given that previous post. But the truth of the matter is that none of us know anything other than the fact he was arrested and charged.

    #882 6 years ago
    Quoted from Manimal:

    I agree with what you say, but the comment about the 17 year old was just to make a point. How many times did you work a case where you were immediately convinced a guy was guilty, but then the case ended up taking a 180 degree turn and you find out it was someone else? All I am saying is he deserves his day in court and people should stop making assumptions and hear the facts first. Experience would tell me there is a lot more going on here than meets the eye, especially given that previous post. But the truth of the matter is that none of us know anything other than the fact he was arrested and charged.

    Agree 1000%, but the odds are most likely not stacking in his favor but we need to have faith in the system to prove or disprove any accusations level against him. Now not saying this is the case but if the feds are involved too which we don't know at this point....oh boy that's another whole can of whoop ass.

    #883 6 years ago
    Quoted from vid1900:

    Thank you for verifying that fact.
    Do you still have the IP records on who posted it?

    Always at your service.
    Vid

    Just looked on my site editor and history doesn't seem to go that far back. Perhaps there could be a way to find out if needed. I would likely have to get tech support on the line.

    #884 6 years ago
    Quoted from Manimal:

    I have seen guys who I felt were innocent, convicted because of really shoddy evidence and a mob mentality. I always ask myself how I would react if I were them. We are all 1 accusation away from being in the same shoes he is. And to that you say, "well if I am innocent, I have nothing to be afraid of"........but we have no idea if JT is guilty of anything, and he has 800 posts of something to be afraid of.

    I worked for a large company for many years. Every now and then, you'd come to work in the morning to whispered gossip that some (reasonably well-liked) person in another department was fired the night before but that's all we'd know. We never would be formally told why as it was always deemed a "need to know" basis. There might be some gossip for awhile but no group demands for accountability were made of our employer as there was a labor union and a process and in that process is where the justice would be found.

    Over the years, many of us employees each took our turn at being character-assassinated at the hands of fellow employees who interpreted situations in which they did not have first-hand knowledge. It was never good and never helpful and we were just stuck with enduring the scarlet letter placed upon us, until the winds of boredom blew their attention to the next new shiny bauble. Because I am not a socially needy person, I was an occasional target for others who were. In one experience, I worked hard to save my job from layoff which meant concurrently saving the jobs of 17 other people while several of them in their low character made my work situation so untenable with their harassment that I had to invoke the EEOC to get the employer to get those folks to back off. I was successful in both things and, to this day, those hillbillies cannot acknowledge that I saved their jobs.

    I bother you with this story because of these 800 posts. The single event of this arrest has garnered a mythology of sorts, and people look to the pinball manufacturer to say something... anything... to participate in the script of this mythology probably because that is the choreography to which we have been accustomed. The podcasters and other such clarions have something with which to fill another day's broadcast and may run it out, getting their pound of flesh, until their cost exceeds their benefits. This single event, with no other facts, creates all this mastication. JT becomes the excuse for many people to do what they are apt to do anyway. I have been that excuse enough times.

    I know Steve Ritchie well enough that what he is reported to have said was not an endorsement of the behavior in question nor was it to minimize what the behavior is. Nobody goes online to defend this crime. Even if I did not know him at all, I would not play it like he meant those things. I mean that would be just too drama queen for me. I have enough life experience to understand people and to know it is best to give people the benefit of the doubt in things that they say. Especially when he is as peripheral to what happened as are you and me. I would have hoped that some people would have brought their life experience to this in lieu of demanding the choreography of an apology.

    I see it as his plea to not contribute to the very mythology that is happening because, in time, I predict more people will tire and start to join him in wishing the topic would go away. Steve has a misunderstood prescience. We adore him for this quality when he designs games and we should remember it at times like this.

    Thank you.

    #886 6 years ago
    Quoted from vid1900:

    Google does not find the phrase "Do people know who Mr. Trudeau really is?" except for today's date, on the German site:
    http://www.flippermarkt.de/community/forum/showthread.php?p=1481237.
    You'd imagine that if it's been up for 4 years on Performance Pinball, it would be indexed by now.
    The OPs name is "Ghost of pinball past" and does not have a link associated with it, just like the other posts created by Kevin.
    I'd say clickbaiting .
    ..
    How long will it take Google to index it on Pinside, now that I've just put the phrase up here?
    .

    you need to understand more about how google does indexing and the whole page value stuff. Just because its there doesn't mean google will index it. Now you've linked to flipper though, google will start to notice that.

    #887 6 years ago
    Quoted from vanilla:

    labor union and a process and in that process is where the justice would be found.

    Union justice...lol...

    The only thing the union has done in the nearly 10 years I've been in my current job is to keep people who didn't do their work in their jobs, and waste my time coming around every so often thinking I give a crap about which one of those lazy f's gets elected to be treasuer. Joke is on them, I vote for the people that DON'T harass me at my desk. I haven't had an actual legitimate raise in 6 years. Some of those years I've actually taken pay CUTS. I dunno about other unions, but the CWA is a friggin' JOKE.

    #888 6 years ago

    John Trudeau's new shirt:

    IMG_8504 (resized).JPGIMG_8504 (resized).JPG

    #889 6 years ago

    I thought Steve obviously meant that someone's trouble in their personal life is generally irrelevant to their professional life. If we didn't have to go on and on about how many children we have so this is how outraged we are, and argue about how things are tainted now or not, it could all blow over, as in JT simply doesn't work at Stern any more and that's the extent of its effect on pinball.

    All this guessing and speculating is tawdry, obsessive rubbernecking. Yes, the alleged crime raises a vile and terrifying specter, so emotions run high, but think for a second, perhaps that is causing a huge and premature overreaction? Let the justice system do what it's there for.

    Meanwhile, I'd also like to point out that it's not someone "is innocent until proven guilty." (Unless you subscribe to Bill Clinton's "is"!) It's "presumed innocent" and if someone actually "is innocent" then they did no crime.

    #891 6 years ago
    Quoted from vanilla:

    I worked for a large company for many years. Every now and then, you'd come to work in the morning to whispered gossip that some (reasonably well-liked) person in another department was fired the night before but that's all we'd know. We never would be formally told why as it was always deemed a "need to know" basis. There might be some gossip for awhile but no group demands for accountability were made of our employer as there was a labor union and a process and in that process is where the justice would be found.

    Every time a Chinese restaurant goes out of business around my house, without fail a neighbor will tell me, in hushed tones, that the Health Department found cats in the freezer and shut the place down.

    I always tell them that we used to eat cats all the time in Switzerland and nobody ever worried about it. Their delicious.

    #893 6 years ago

    Steve said "It was a bad day for pinball." He did not say it was a bad day for John Trudeau. I think people incorrectly made a logical jump to Steve hoping John's problem went away.
    The crime is despicable, but it should not be associated with pinball. Steve wanted "it" to go away for pinball. If you are demonizing Steve for the post, you are implying that Steve is too stupid to realize that not posting about it would make John's problems go away....

    #894 6 years ago
    Quoted from Skypilot:

    Taste like chicken.

    Taste like fish..........

    #895 6 years ago
    Quoted from AaronJames:

    John Trudeau's new shirt:

    And I thought nothing in this thread would so much as make me chuckle....

    #896 6 years ago

    Come on, I don't like SR either but he's not stupid. Very smart according to him

    I think he was being a smart ass and it came out wrong.

    He knows Pinside isn't going silent on any shitstorm of ANY relevance and this one is a biggie

    43
    #897 6 years ago

    Anyone claiming to be upset with SR is a (insert personal insult) that just likes to complain IMO.

    The dude was in shock @ the situation & doesn't have political advisors to feed him perfect scrubbed replies.

    Look at *some* of the shit you guys wrote. Stupid replies & self rightous manifestos.

    Aaaaaaand if I was Gary I wouldn't say shit to the media. Can't trust those antagonists. F em. IMO Stern should just say "We cannot comment on the situation" & move on.

    I have some Stern gripes but this situation aint one of em. I think some folks are taking out their Stern frustrations with a false campaign right now.

    #898 6 years ago
    Quoted from vid1900:

    we used to eat cats all the time

    OMG Vid!!! And I used to like you . . . .

    #899 6 years ago

    Right on Curly. F ing media

    Wouldn't say a F ing word either. Let the system play out

    11
    #900 6 years ago

    Yeah! F the media! Fake news! Media sucks! It's their fault!!!!

    Uhh wait what are we talking about again? I get lost in my own rage sometimes.

    There are 1,376 posts in this topic. You are on page 18 of 28.

    This topic is closed.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/just-came-across-this/page/18?hl=mbaumle and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.