Quoted from John1210:The actions of Damien and Marty and their eloquent business exit strategy that we've all witnessed clearly shows they were in it for the dollar, and the love of pinball and the community were a long distant 2nd.
Bit tired of hearing this "someone tried" crap. They owe good people their earnings, or a pinball. The latter is no longer possible.
He did a great sales job didn't he ? Business founders get rewarded by running confidence building rackets, intentional scams or not, where they purposely equate themselves with their business. If you believe in the person you also by extension believe in the company. His videos were designed to convince us he was a caring, swell guy, who just loved pinball and it worked. The problem is legally none of that was ever true if set up properly (and he for sure set it up properly). The business is the business and the founder is the founder with a large wall between them. You only get to see the wall when the business fails. He as CEO followed the law, his obligation is done, personal ethics for the mess left in its wake not warranted or legally applicable.
Painful as it is to say, they don't owe people their earnings, Haggis owes people their earnings. They are legally not Haggis.
I don't disagree with anything you have written, I would personally be devastated if my own business cost people their hard earned $s. But that's not how we define the matter legally. As they say the law doesn't care if you are a scoundrel, just that you don't break any of its rules of the game while being a scoundrel.