If I'm beginning to learn one thing about humanity from observing discussions on Pinside all these years...

1. Two people can observe the same damn thing and come away with completely different opinions. How is that even possible?
2. My best guess: People can have different priorities when judging things. i.e. (code over theme) (theme over layout) (layout over code) etc...
3. When priorities are different, there is a much lower likelihood for common ground in the discussion.

So if that's the case -- is it more useful to argue a point? a priority? both? neither?
-mof

This thread proves yet once again, you just can't please everybody.
-mof

Looks great!
-mof

Perhaps the artwork reminds you of NF? -- but not the layout at all, amigo...

BK3 is a precisely flat wall of posts and targets that brick far too many shots. It's inspired by the kinda-flat post experiment that was BoP -- but with BoP there are fewer posts, and they are wider apart than with BK3 (and no flat targets to brick you).

What you are looking at in No Fear (which is a great name, cause there's nothing to be afraid on in this very fair layout) -- is a standard wide open and deep asymmetrical fan placement of posts that you see throughout the 90s and most moderns, without any flat targets blocking a lane, where missing a shot is not automatically fatal.

-mof

A guy walks into a bar, and asks whether the toy in the pinball machine is lame, and

ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE.

-mof

I see we're now at the personal attack stage of the thread lifecycle, so I thought it was time to ask...

Was this thread created so that ideas could flourish, or was it set up as a trap so that non-believers could be cornered and bullied? (Fanboy thread, or is free speech allowed and welcomed?)

thanks...
-mof