(Topic ID: 260902)

Iron Man to be rereleased

By Lethal_Inc

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 390 posts
  • 134 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 4 years ago by kapsreiter
  • Topic is favorited by 12 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

Bildschirmfoto 2020-04-09 um 20.47.38 (resized).png
pasted_image (resized).png
pasted_image (resized).png
0d9300073f9459d8bae8c17bf39622f47e1eb62d (resized).jpg
IMG_7254 (resized).JPG
IMG_7256 (resized).JPG
stern-pinball-ces-2015-005-843x562 (resized).jpg
D93073D0-CCE6-4B66-9EB2-940C108C7ECE (resized).png
8B0A10BC-F932-4131-84B8-C0FF1D2DD3F0 (resized).jpeg
IMG_3397 (resized).jpg
IMG_3396 (resized).jpg
IMG_3395 (resized).jpg
image (resized).jpeg
mdj (resized).jpg
MDJ (resized).jpg
download (1) (resized).jpg

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider porkcarrot.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

16
#18 4 years ago

Keep 'em coming! Flood the market. Make it so cheap everyone has an Iron Man!

#103 4 years ago

All these complaints and comments about what this must mean about other machines and sales and what it earns and what Stern is planning are all incredibly laughable.

1. Unless you work for Stern and are involved in those discussions, you don't know the actual reason for these decisions. There are plenty of reasons they decided to do this now, none of us actually knows.
2. How does this hurt you? Maybe if you have a first run on the vault and don't like the idea there being more out there and affecting the value I can see it, but that negates any want for any vault ever, and most of us want more vaults. Otherwise, you don't know what is going on behind the scenes so you can't claim this is bad because of X reason.
3. Ultimately this means more of the machine available. Many people like this machine. Having more of them available is only good for people in the hobby who would like to have one.

#139 4 years ago
Quoted from PinMonk:

But bad for people selling perfect originals or beautiful, first time around vaults that were already struggling to get even $5k for it. So it is not a victimless crime, and answers the question from #2.
Yes, I'm classifying this unwanted re-vault as a crime against pinball. For the record. The precedent is set.

But that is literally the only argument against it, that it devalues the current machines, which is true. But the benefit to the community at large far out weighs that. Any remake or vault is going to do that. MM and AFM were much bigger deals than this money wise and I think the vast majority of people would agree those remakes are a great thing that happened. It only hurts people who have been using pins as investments, which should be a fairly small number, and frankly, sorry but get over it. Pinball is not guaranteed money, it is an expensive toy that may appreciate or depreciate. That's how it goes. But having more of the toys available is better for everyone else and will probably benefit you when it comes to some other game that gets remade.

#146 4 years ago

Honestly all these complaints about not vaulting Tron or LoTR are also ridiculous. You have no idea what it would cost to make vault editions of them. The cost for the license, the cost for the upgrade from whitestar, the cost to remake the parts, the cost to redo the art (as some have suggested), other costs we probably aren't even thinking about.

They surely have done the math on this and have come to the conclusion that it isn't viable without them charging more than the current rates (at which point all of you would bitch about that cost and how Stern is cheap and are con artists). Or there is some technical limitation making it not possible to do. If they could do it at a point where it made financial sense, they absolutely would. As has been pointed out many times, they are a business and they like to make money.

The idea that they won't remake it because people would realize their new products aren't the same is laughably stupid. Do you think anyone that would care doesn't already know that?

#147 4 years ago
Quoted from PinMonk:

No, that's the smaller argument. The main one is it's the re-vault no one asked for, and the market doesn't want or need.

But, you are making that argument absent of the facts, because we don't know the facts. Maybe they had parts around for these machines already, or had a great deal on getting more parts made cheaply. It would be financially stupid of them not to make it if they had the parts to do it. It doesn't matter that you don't want it. Someone will. There are always people with deep pockets that will buy the games they put out.

None of us can say what the market wants or needs. The market surely didn't need a Beatles reskin or another Elvira machine, but Stern made them, and people bought them, and Stern made money, and we get to play them. That's how it works.

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider porkcarrot.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/iron-man-to-be-rereleased?tu=porkcarrot and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.