(Topic ID: 260902)

Iron Man to be rereleased

By Lethal_Inc

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 390 posts
  • 134 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 4 years ago by kapsreiter
  • Topic is favorited by 12 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

Bildschirmfoto 2020-04-09 um 20.47.38 (resized).png
pasted_image (resized).png
pasted_image (resized).png
0d9300073f9459d8bae8c17bf39622f47e1eb62d (resized).jpg
IMG_7254 (resized).JPG
IMG_7256 (resized).JPG
stern-pinball-ces-2015-005-843x562 (resized).jpg
D93073D0-CCE6-4B66-9EB2-940C108C7ECE (resized).png
8B0A10BC-F932-4131-84B8-C0FF1D2DD3F0 (resized).jpeg
IMG_3397 (resized).jpg
IMG_3396 (resized).jpg
IMG_3395 (resized).jpg
image (resized).jpeg
mdj (resized).jpg
MDJ (resized).jpg
download (1) (resized).jpg

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider T3quila.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

#315 4 years ago
Quoted from northvibe:

From a business standpoint, unless producing old full board sets is cheap, why not convert all vaults to spike 2. Save money and inventory on building and storing transformers, wire, boards, light sockets etc. just think, why build two different cabinets, 2 different board sets, 2 different power setups, etc etc. it doesn’t make sense for them to keep building vaults with all original parts...

Because you have to redevelop the code for a completely different system and framework. Takes currently forever to get to 1.0 on code - imagine you re-incur that cost.

#325 4 years ago
Quoted from northvibe:

It is refactoring current code to a new hardware. The code was already complete.
Remember they already have done this with a walking dead, iirc.

Didn't know that they redeveloped walking dead for SPIKE2. I was only aware of SAM TWD. I figured the toolchain / language / framework for a 20 year old system vs a 2 year old one would be completely different. Refactoring to a completely foreign system is likely non-trivial, but true, they don't need to think through the what it is supposed to be doing part of the ruleset anymore.

#356 4 years ago
Quoted from flynnibus:

They didn't really... what the reference to was TWD was used in development of Spike. TWD was shown at shows to demo the new boardset. So while they did do porting of existing application code for that game.. it wasn't done for commercial reasons.
The modern games are developed like you would expect modern software to be.. an OS, a platform that provides base functionalities, and application code. There should be a reasonable hardware abstraction provided by the platform/base level so that re-use value would be high and to streamline game code development.

Seems reasonable that they have something like MPF for themselves.

Still need to redo the video assets since you switch from DMD to LCD unless they just rerender the output to make it look the same on an LCD like a DMD.

Either way, I figure there is some prohibitive cost involved that we're not thinking off, otherwise like somebody mentioned, they would have already done it, since that is pretty much the first thought that everybody comes up with.

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider T3quila.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/iron-man-to-be-rereleased?tu=T3quila and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.