You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider mardi-gras-man.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Quoted from hank527:I think a game should need 500 ratings to crack the top 10. Otherwise, it’s fair game.
That's it - maybe 300 would be enough, but 500 surely would be better.
It's really lame and boring to see any new game shooting up to number one.
All of this could be stopped by a certain number of ratings for new machines, and no improved Pinside-system would be neccessary.
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider mardi-gras-man.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/impose-temporary-ban-on-ratings-for-newer-games?tu=mardi-gras-man and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
Bingen Am Rhein
