Yup! I've been told it's available on demand.
I'm not really sure what you're asking, but my only real issue with going to Pennhurst was to "glamorize" mental health and turn it into some spectacle of paranormal ghost hunting stuff. I was never okay with doing that, and I think we did a good job at avoiding that pitfall while filming.
Oh for sure! Me, Zak, and Austin all grew up together. I met Zak in 2nd grade, and we've been close friends ever since. Austin is his cousin, and he was just always around with us until he and his family recently relocated to another state. I think that's what makes our dynamic work so well. Originally, A&E wanted a group of 5 people, but since we only had 3, they casted Katie and Ali separately. We had never met them until the first day of the shoot.
We were financially compensated by A&E per episode.
Austin was/is all about challenging himself. He felt he was able to go back. I can't speak for him, but it seemed like he was more equipped at going down there again alone now knowing what to expect.
Quoted from jeffspinballpalace:
Why only hunt at night? That seems like a huge assumption made which could negatively impact your study. I’d have brought a second 5 person team to investigate in parallel, but during the day.
Excellent question. I think it really boils down to just atmosphere these days. The audience expects ghost hunting at night to make the atmosphere more foreboding. I agree with you though: We should have done some investigations during the day. From a "scientific" perspective, there's no reason that wouldn't be just as effective as doing it at night.
However, daytime was reserved for daytime shooting. We would conduct interviews (many of which were cut from the edit, unfortunately), the camera crew would get B-roll footage of buildings, us walking, etc. Also, we shot from around noon to 4-5 am most days. We would have needed to literally double our crew to do a parallel investigation during the day. For example, just filming us walking out of the tent would take 45 minutes because we'd need multiple shots from different angles, and each re-take would need to be done nearly identically to the last one for consistency.
Quoted from jeffspinballpalace:
When you got readings, why not leave equipment there and revisit it when it goes off again in subsequent nights? You should have blanketed the building being studied with 40 to 50 motion detector cameras while you were inside. Bottom line you need a bigger equipment budget.
We actually did exactly this. It wasn't shown in the final cut, unfortunately.
Quoted from jeffspinballpalace:
Likewise why not have a standard set of equipment to take on every event? I am thinking the SLS camera, box with leds for magnetic field, thermometers and cameras. So when you do get activity, you can measure with all devices in a more uniform way.
We also did this as well, but again, the audience only saw what the editors wanted you to see. We actually went through EXTREME measures to make each night of investigations as consistent as we could, using base sweeps and using gear redundancies. Bottom line is, this kind of stuff isn't exciting to most audiences, they want to see the unexplained spooks.
We didn't have any or know one to bring, and the amount of time they gave us to prepare was too prohibitive to get one. Also, from a resource perspective, watching a dog while we were literally grinding away 15 hour days would have been a logistical pain in the ass.
Quoted from jeffspinballpalace:
From a scientific viewpoint, what would happen if you revisited for two weeks and you came in with an enhanced plan? But carried out daytime exploration with another team and brought more equipment. Shouldn’t you get the same type results (aka repeatable experience) plus more?
Possibly. We really did a lot of exhaustive repeating experiments that, again, were not shown for reasons beyond my control. These buildings introduce a TON of variables. They're old, falling apart, windows are broken open, drafty, etc. So yea, going back could yield better results, but at the same time, we really did take as much of a comprehensive look as I think we could do given the time we had.