Quoted from Atomicboy:Are the optos no longer through hole on your boards? The two I have seen were SMD from I recall. I have had two friends bring non-working ones to me that I could not do anything for, that's what I'm going on. Unless, I'm mixing yours up with someone else's, but I believe they were yours.
They weren't GLM boards then. We have only used thruhole optos on the ball trough boards since day one.
Currently we do have one product that uses SMD receiver optos, the Doctor Who 5 bank target board set. The reason for that was due to the fact that the normal receivers that we use on the ball trough boards don't fit there due to a height restriction. We were using a Williams style receiver there, but found that they were too sensitive to ambient light and were causing issues.
So we converted it over to a recessed style SMD receiver which uses the PCB and the target bank itself as a light shield. Works great, but that has been the only area where we've gone SMD for optos, and that was only because it was absolutely the best part for the job.
And on a related note, I would highly recommend that people avoid buying and using receiver optos that are being sold as "factory" or "Williams" original. They are very likely to give you trouble.
Quoted from Atomicboy:Regardless, I myself would still prefer repairing these boards with all through hole parts. While I agree the chances of the resisters failing are rare, the problem with these boards has always been the vibration. I have always been leery about SMD parts near areas of high vibration, as there is not as much strength as with through hole, that has much more surface area for contact. Given the vibration where these boards are, I have had countless solder cracks for the pads of many resisters on these boards. The SMD resistors on your boards as such worry me for long term use OVER the original, but obviously in some situations (no boards, too far gone to repair), it is great there is an option.
This was debated to great length when I started making these boards. At the time I actually designed and manufactured force (impact) sensors for a living and all of the electronics we used were SMD. These sensors were subjected to millions of impacts with near zero failure (usually it was the actual sensor that failed, not the electronics). Boards with SMD parts actually hold up better than thruhole boards and the reason is very simple. SMD parts are very low mass, with a high bonding area. Thruhole parts are the exact opposite, higher mass, smaller bonding area.
You might think that the hole would give mechanical strength, but it is actually a potential point of failure because you can never be sure how well the PCB house made that hole and how well that part has been soldered in. These days we even have to worry about plating separation on thruhole part leads!
Anyway, under vibration, the plating in that hole is going to be the first thing to separate as you have a high mass (thruhole) part constantly working on it. This may cause a disconnect between the top and bottom traces on the board which will oftentimes cause a board to stop working even if the part is still good. The WPC power board is a good example of what happens when these holes go bad (and that board doesn't even get the amount of vibration that the ball trough boards get!). We have to add a pile of jumpers to bypass the broken holes.
Quoted from Atomicboy:Given they are opto through hole though (still curious if this has always been the case or if they were SMD at one time), that is clearly much more manageable for future repairs, but I myself would still be inclined to always deal with the originals for these boards until they are too far gone.
And that is perfectly fine. My goal here is to hopefully prevent people from getting the wrong idea about boards with SMD parts on them. If designed right, they are very likely to be better than an equivalent thruhole only board. But design them wrong...Stern....and people are likely to not want to trust anything SMD.
Cheers,
Tony