(Topic ID: 274434)

how ridiculous...this Pinside Top 100 ranking

By ParisPinballAdct

3 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 129 posts
  • 69 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 2 years ago by Coz
  • Topic is favorited by 1 Pinsider

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    C4AAB0E4-E503-45BA-82CF-DEE6E9FF3ADC (resized).jpeg
    30CDD5A5-E294-4962-B14B-D2EE2570A5C5 (resized).jpeg
    289E9C48-FC01-4078-90F3-5353DFD09325 (resized).jpeg
    D047AC3E-995E-4E3A-8517-EE82E7F6AE1D (resized).png
    4B31E876-480E-4037-90E8-8602FA4153C9 (resized).png
    79EFE212-AD41-4CD3-8BE8-5724DE5B0C16 (resized).png
    AFD5A82A-5196-4F98-BC59-A8C465B3D0D3 (resized).png
    Untitled (resized).png
    Screenshot_20210111-090820_Chrome (resized).jpg
    pasted_image (resized).png
    63B2C378-E411-42E8-8B99-955703E43E03 (resized).jpeg
    D4043E8B-65EE-4B68-9E97-FF9518025797 (resized).jpeg
    pasted_image (resized).png

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider nicoy3k.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #49 3 years ago

    I think if you try to remove the nostalgia bias these new games are objectively better than the oldies in many ways. Iron Maiden and Jurassic Park are true master pieces... for sure deserving of spots in the top 10. TNMT has already fallen since you posted this a month ago.

    #54 3 years ago
    Quoted from mbeardsley:

    Yes, that's true...but those two cases are the exceptions, and I would argue that this is reasonable.
    For example, when I played TWD, I thought it sucked (and I still don't understand what people see in it) and it was likely that this was partially due to early code. But all too often, on location, the early code never gets updated by the operator (unless there is some problem that requires an update)...so that's the code that (non-owners) play and know (and rate by).
    The BM66 near me still had no secondary villain modes the last time I played it (not sure what version it was, but was obviously early). And while I still like the game, I'm not going to give it a better rating just because someone on line says "the new code is great".
    If you are going to release an unfinished game, you can't complain if people rate the game based on what they actually play, not what might eventually get released.

    Not sure that’s rational. If a game has improved its code the scores should reflect that. I think equally as unfair as owners pumping up the scores of a new purchase are those who played a turd version of a game on location for 5 minutes and decided it sucks. I think this is especially a problem now that games are primarily going into people homes.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider nicoy3k.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/how-ridiculousthis-pinside-top-100-ranking?tu=nicoy3k and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.