Quoted from Bublehead:So why does this ring so hollow for the people wanting CC to be CCC? Don't tell me there are not people who want expanded code, they sold a few BOP 2.0's and people say CC needs a code update. If it is "the classic" you say it is, then why do people want a code update for CC? Just put out that wonderful classic code and be done with it. Yeah, right, and we have an actual developer adding (with permission) things to old B/W classic titles, there's even a thread here on it, along with fixing old bugs? You are not the entire voice of Pinside Crazy, so lets let others chime in before you try your major thread squashing tactics here, OK?
People want "custom/expanded code." Just like they want every game to have 15 magnets and 3 upper and lower playfields.
Doesn't mean it makes any sense for CGC to do it.
I repeat, all of their remakes have sold out, without having to invest time, money, and staffing resources on fixing what isn't broken: classic Lyman code.
It's an idea that doesn't seem to make sense for a company whose reason to exist is profit. But then, Pinside specializes in this kind of "fan fiction" thinking.