Going to hop on my pro-cargument soapbox. Sometimes a car analogy works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes a food analogy works. I don't see anyone clutch their pearls and yell "foodgument!" when someone compares a JJP CE to a steak and a Stern pro to a hamburger.

If anything, a car is almost too close a value comparison to a pin (especially these days), which forces people to clarify that no, in fact, a pinball machine is not a car. No shit Sherlock, that's why language provides analogies.

Audiogument! Astrogument!

I wasn't defending that particular cargument, nimrods. (I agree with you, it was wrong!) I took issue with Levi's blanket assertion that all carguments are inherently invalid. Reading comprehension, it's a thing.

How about "don't expect your Joe Balcer game to hold its value any more than a Corolla."

^ Great avatar.

The handful of times I've called Stern tech support, they've never asked if I'm the original owner. One time I wasn't even the owner. I was borrowing a game from a friend, an LE-specific part crapped out, and they mailed a replacement no questions asked, well outside the warranty period. I find them very reasonable if you're polite and patient.

Yup.

zzz...

Post a video of you making that shot 19 of 20 times and I'll PayPal you $100. Easy money.

Funhouse and Tron are the same game! ...on paper.