Quoted from kpg:It really is total BS guys.
This is the only product I can buy, at any price, and not be able to properly return it.
This is why Stern will resist going direct to consumer and calling these consumer goods. In part, the consumer protection laws don't apply to commercial equipment.
Your recent PF chipping is actually GOOD news. It means the playfield has failed in ways that are not just cosmetic and in a catastrophic way that you don't have to argue about 'what will happen in the future'. This is the kind of failure that Stern can't dance around.
As I keep telling you... you need to understand how Stern operates. Proactive, transparent, rapid... none of these words are in the lexicon. This goes all the way back to when you all were freaking out about when games would be made, details released, 'wheres the LE video', etc etc etc. This is all the same when it comes to how Stern handles information flow. You all want it to be like a modern, public facing etailer... they aren't. Don't get worked up because its been 24hrs and no response, etc.. or why haven't they posted a statement, etc. They won't. Just come to terms with that. Take a breath.. stop getting flustered over that.. and just look to your actual product resolution.
While they are none of those modern, etailers, they generally do make things whole for customers who have clear defects and who work with them in a reasonable (to their standard) way. Dime sized PF chunk coming off in the first week? They are going to replace your PF - no doubt.
The challenge is you need to work through their wonkyness and timelines. It's not going to be turnkey, rainbows, and unicorns. They make it difficult when they play hot potato without being clear on which types of cases should be handled directly by the customer talking to support, or what needs to be parts orders/rmas through the distributor.
Your email escalations are the right path.. make the point you and your distributor need clarity on what Stern's expected path is to handle this. Don't freak out over timelines... push to say 'what is the process you want us to follow' in detail. Be clear that chunks of the playfield coming up are not blemishes or acceptable variances and that you expect the PF to be replaced. Then address that you are aware of the larger problem of PF issues and that neither party wants to repeat this process, so lets get the manufacturing issues resolved THEN get a new PF. Don't try to demand an explaintation of the background, why, etc... leave their business to them.. and just focus on getting an acceptable replacement. Be clear that if Stern doesn't want to handle this directly through their own support, but through the distribution channel, please provide Trent with the details they want. Push to have some sort of case or ticket number that can be used to reference the case and timelines in the future.
I have ZERO doubt Stern is going to replace your playfield.. but as I said the other week, curb your expectations in terms of response timeframes, how long the whole thing is going to take, and the level of detail you are going to get. Your step #1 is getting assurances they will replace the PF. Step #2 is get an estimate of timeframe (this is going to be LOOSE) and Step #3 will be following up to track that till it happens. Your replacement is going to hang off the end of production schedules... be ready for that.
On the whole communication and handling things, this is another area where your buying source comes into play. If you want consumer-like experience, buy from a local retailer. If you want the best price and low frills... you buy wholesale from a remote distributor. But its hard to get both the high-touch support and lowest price in the same purchase.