Quoted from jkleinnd:....the ONLY thing left to think about if a choice has to be made, and it has to be made NOW is whether GOT's playfield layout is starting out fundamentally more entertaining than TWD.
I'm remembering the disappointment in TWD's playfield when if first came out, nevermind the code. We know that TWD code has since made up for that, and, frankly, reversed the trend and created a new love for TWD. I have not heard nearly as much dislike for GOT's layout debut, just more of a debate over which version is faster/ slower. So.... if code can salvage an inferior playfield.... it looks pretty good for a GOT... unless Stern snatches defeat out of the jaws of victory with bad code updates. ha
Neither playfield will be "better" overall as this is a completely subjective measurement, and different people will have different opinions on which machine they prefer.
I find there is nothing wrong with TWD's playfield design. And pinside blew this way out of proportion, as often happens here. Great code cannot make a bad shooting pin or bad design become great shooting. It's just a convenient excuse. There has to be a good playfield layout if coding makes the machine stand out. Lyman called the PF design his best one yet. The playfield design got a bad rep on pinside early on. The culprits ended up being people with minimal play experience (typically some games on location), poorly set-up machines (proper levelling is important), as well as people who don't like machines with significant drains or faster ball times.
'
'
TWD can drain a lot, but there can be a lot of longer ball times as well. I recommend people watch the youtube video recently made with Jack Danger, Lyman, et al. shooting a TWD Prem. You'll see some long and entertaining ball times, as well as short ones. TWD actually offers a large range of play times, the biggest spread I've seen in a game. The PF design may not be everyone's cup of tea (their preference in style), but it obviously isn't bad.
'
'
As for TWD versus GOT, its going to depend on your personal preference. They play notably differently. So there is no better or best OP.
Instead, you need to figure out what type of machine you like to play and which one better fits that style.
GOT is having longer ball times from feedback. I'd expect TWD to punish poor play much more so with drains, but this tends to make a lot of people enjoy it more, it rewards great play, and it contributes to a just-one-more-game feel.
Of note, TWD is coded by Lyman. GOT is coded by Dwight Sullivan. This is important, but also dependent on personal preference. A few people don't like Lyman coded games, while most consider him one of the top two coders in pinball, if not the best.
I am very interested in the GOT LE/Prem. I am considering adding one to my collection as I think it will complement TWD very nicely being a notably different type of play. I very much like the idea of having pins with contrasting playing styles in a collection.
I think GOT will end up being a great game, but it's a guess at this time as to how how good since coding is a long way off from being done. And code is important. Very important.