Haunted House, CFTBL also.

Krull.

LTG : )™

Elektra, Genesis, Street Fighter 2

CFTBL doesnt count as a playfield

Does Fan-Tas-Tic count?

Varkon for sure

In Development: TBL

oops

_{Post edited by pinwiztom: varkon already mentioned}

how about Game Plan's loch ness monster

Black Hole. the most challenging multiball in pinball -- both to achieve and to maintain.

You should add Elektra to that poll.

I've played the hell out of the iPad version and I own one in real life. nothing against TPA, but the real version is a LOT more challenging.

Fan-Tas-Tic.! Its all part of the game, its interactive therefore it should count.! I'd draw more concern to SF-II..! Could that crate of crap even be considered a game..?

CFTBL does not have a lower PF it's a hologram. Cool but not anything like AcDc or Congo.

I voted for AcDc as I'm very impressed with it, Congo just seems dumb to me.

The only one I have owned was a Haunted House. It was okay . . . kinda slow though. Sold it after 6 months.
Mike

Just voted for Black Hole. 'Cause No One Escapes the Black Hole!

There's a window on the playfield of Escape from the Lost World, but it's just a viewing window. It serves no purpose.

unfortunately ACDC is a direct ripoff of WWFRR upper pf and not even as good with worse geometry and 1 less shot.

Thanks for clearing that up.

I didn't even know that was a problem. Could you explain why you think being a ripoff as you say is a problem? considering I have never seen WWFRR before, it would seem to me that is not really such a problem, and having PF under the actual playing area is much better than having them take up real estate from the main game don't you think?

lack of ingenutiy is always a problem in my opinion when preference is to either seemlessly integrate the new or improve upon the old.

WWFRR has drops instead of standups, has the dead end lock to the left, better physics and only covers up real eastate that is not needed as the shot entrances are still visible on main pf.

WWFRR.jpg

That looks cool. I'd like to play WWF.

I never take subtract fun points if something is a copy or rip off. That does not effect my enjoyment. I read some people say Tron is an exact copy of Fun House or has similar shots or layout. However I've played FH and to me it doesn't matter if Tron is a copy or not, they play different have different rules and different art and theme. If FH came first that doesn't effect me in the least. Others it really seems to get under their skin for some reason.

To each there own.

I just really dislike when I see a game where a designer kind of "wasted" space by reusing something with nearly identical layout/geometry as a previous game.

Granted, there are only so many things that can be done inside thelimited footprint but IMHO that is what great designers do.

I see your point, but some people would say Star Wars movie was a copy of Akira Kurosawa's 'Hidden Fortress'

However, you see my point if I don't have access to WWF of if I prefer the modern games or theme more then I don't care where the inspiration or copy came from. I don't count AcDc only because it's lower PF that's just an added bonus. I like the way AcDc lower PF never drains just times out, I like the lighting effect and the callouts in the lower PF.

Not everyone likes the same games as evident by some people who prefer modern Stern and some who don't. But it doesn't bother me if a game borrows a good idea. So The Hobbit will have 'trolls' and XMLE has NC (aka troll like mechanism). But I don't have MM I have XMLE so I enjoy the mechanism on XMLE. Some people don't like that everything is not 100% new but I don't care.