I still think people are using the term "code" wrong. "Half-ass code" would imply that there are missing features or game breaking bugs. "Back in the day" we'd complain about code in games like Wheel of Fortune because there were Wizard Mode inserts that had no function, Multiball scores always showed 00 on the DMD, etc. Munsters seems to be very complete game and exactly the game Dwight set out to make. If you don't like it, that's fair - but that isn't a "code" issue...that's just a subjective opinion about the ruleset/game design.

B66 is a totally different scenario. It was released before almost any programming was complete. Lyman didn’t have the proper development time to “make a game”. The constant code drops are him finishing his job, because the rules hadn’t been designed fully and the game was incomplete. That is a true “code issue”.

Munsters is the game Dwight wants it to be. Any changes at this point are likely to be minor tweaks and polish. People expecting a broad re-write or expansion aren’t going to get it.

I think so. Lots of shots & the multiball is fun! ...but it's going to fall into two camps: I like mini playfields, I hate mini playfields. Play it yourself to judge.

Family Guy has an upper playfield

Munsters feels the same because it's using smaller parts. So, you probably won't like it.