Quoted from jeffspinballpalace:Let's say someone buys the spot at obo price, and after monies have settled, wants to ensure JPOP recognizes that the entitlement party has changed. There is only one company I know of with worse record keeping ... SkitB. Phoning John via his warranty hotline has proven to be futile. You might say spotting JPOP has proven more elusive than finding a clear high-res pic of Bigfoot.
In the future if game is manufactured or lawsuit settled, how would new owner actually receive what's coming? Original buyer is listed in lawsuit and would be on JPOPs books, if he had bothered to use them. Sheesh, John didn't even know how much people paid into his Ponzi scheme. Don't want to stall a hot sale, just wondering..
I know seller would be honest and would clear the confusion at once, if contacted about it, but new buyer might prefer to dot his i's before laying out thousands so it's official. Second question - lawsuit likely requires additional money to fight on. Is new buyer required to continue to pay in and can his name be substituted in lawsuit?
Op I have $15k in monopoly funds, ready to send soon. Plus this is much cheaper than BM66SLE bump.
A written contract between you and the seller stating the agreed terms solves the first issue very easily removes jpop's involvement. As for the lawsuit, more money would be assuming the op is part of the proceedings.