(Topic ID: 251634)

Feds Seek Ban on Flavored Vape Liquid/Cigarettes fine

By tbutler6

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 263 posts
  • 68 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 4 years ago by Rager170
  • No one calls this topic a favorite

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic poll

    “Vaping or Smoking”

    • Vaping-not tar/should be safer 20 votes
      36%
    • Cigarettes-dead at 60 aint too bad 7 votes
      13%
    • Grow up and be miserable like me 29 votes
      52%

    (56 votes)

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    chemistry (resized).JPG
    download (2) (resized).jpg
    download (1) (resized).jpg
    A5B5D2ED-3BDA-4A62-B044-4ED4CB821881 (resized).jpeg
    hqdefault (resized).jpg
    images (resized).jpg
    drub (resized).png
    Candy-Cigarettes-Original-WEB_1000x1000 (resized).jpg
    download (2) (resized).jpg
    1731DD6C-995F-4DB3-B2F6-AEAE0C7B43B7 (resized).png
    smoke.gif
    RJR 1975 (resized).PNG
    unicorn-cakes-by-vape-breakfast-classics-90ml-blueberry-pancake-strawberry-milk-e-juice-800x800 (resized).jpg
    D9255B16-DF95-450C-BFE6-CC3A0250DCB5 (resized).jpeg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider cottonm4.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #82 4 years ago
    Quoted from jrpinball:

    When government agencies figure out a way to cash in on it, they will not only keep it legal, but will encourage it.

    I agree. Vaping sort of slid in under the regulator radar several years back. Everybody wants to dis smoking but the truth is that tobacco tax generates a lot of revenue.

    Pack of smokes= $8.00 tax = $2.00 ?? Lotta tax money there.

    16 years ago I started rolling my own. 400 tubes and 1 lb. of tobacco was $12.00. The cigarette companies did not like that and forced the govt. to jack taxes on RYO tobacco when cigarette taxes were raised. A 1lb. Bag of tobacco went from $8.00 to $50.00.

    But all the congressmen like to smoke pipes and did not tax RYO pipe tobacco. So I switched to pipe tobacco for around $12.00 a bag.

    Nicotine gum costs $32.00 a box. I don’t know how much sin tax is put on a box of gum but it is almost cheaper to smoke cigarettes.

    And then I discovered vaping and learned I could choose how much nicotine to put in my vape juice. The only tax was normal sales tax.

    46 years of smoking was finally conquered with 4 months of vaping for about $120.00 total.

    I hate to see the kids get hung up on this vape biz but I also hate to see what can be an effective cheap method to quit smoking get regulated into a wallet busting tax collecting exercise.

    But you are right. Once the govt. figures out how to lay the taxes on it will never go away.

    #91 4 years ago
    Quoted from o-din:

    Yul wasn't the first to run an end of life warning as such.

    I remember watching this warning on TV when I was a kid. And then I would go over to the table where my dad kept his smokes, steal a couple, and then go down to my friend's house. His mom was "cool" and we would light up. I also knew about Yul Brenner, as well. Let's see; 1968. I was 15 at that time.

    #95 4 years ago
    Quoted from fosaisu:

    It’s almost as if that shit’s addictive.

    America's first cash crop. Also with a big export market.

    #106 4 years ago
    Quoted from Methos:

    So what....millions of people have quit, including myself. Take responsibility, you know the shit kills and can't say no? Enjoy your time while you're here.

    Methos, did you turn into a Smoking Nazi or an Anti-smoking Nazi? I knew the shit could kill for me years before I manage to quit; It was around 1966 when I started smoking. I started at the same time the first warning labels were put on the packs: “Caution: Cigarette Smoking May be Harzardous to Your Health."

    How about you? Can you ever say you smoked in ignorance? How many times did you light up and whistle past the graveyard before you finally managed to put them down for good? You never made a midnight run to the store because you were out of smokes? Or dig a butt out of your trashcan because your pack went empty? Tell the truth.

    I have a friend who smoked Pall Mall Reds for years and one day he just put them down and was smoker no more. Were you like that? Most of us had to struggle to give them up.

    #107 4 years ago

    And while vaping is in an uproar in the U.S. over in the UK the attitude is a bit different.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/17/health/vaping-us-uk-e-cigarette-differences-intl/index.html

    #111 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    This is all about the US government losing money to the vaping industry. From what I have read, the deaths are being caused from Vitamin E found in THC cartridges. But the government wants to lump ejuices into the mix. Vitamin E is not found in Ejuice and doesnt make sense to do that either. The Vitamin E in THC is used as a thickener essentially to "cut" the THC Oil.
    Its a strange scenario to just ban everything. When there is a recall on beef for salmonella, they dont go pulling the beef of every company off the shelves...
    The biggest problem is you have people making decision with no knowledge of the products. A lot of talk out and about shows that as well...

    I have been hearing a little bit about this. I can't verify it. But what I hear is that these Juul vapes use a replaceable juice pod. And counterfeiters are making THC pods with Vitamin E oil as the carrier. And as the carrier oil cools off in your lungs it coats them with oil and you can't breathe.

    As stated, I cannot verify this, but sounds plausible. I know several many people who have been vaping for several years without issue. So, a lot of this sounds like the govt. trying to control the revenue and taxes. Sort like online gambling, I suppose.

    #136 4 years ago
    Quoted from o-din:

    I remember the razor blades in apples Halloween scare.
    Damn! Brain cells reappearing that I thought had fizzled out in the 1970s.

    I remember the razor blades and apples. Early 60s.

    I wonder now if those were an urban legend.

    #138 4 years ago
    Quoted from cottonm4:

    I remember the razor blades and apples. Early 60s.
    I wonder now if those were an urban legend.

    Quoted from o-din:

    By the late 60s they were. I never heard first hand what happened.
    Stick with Butterfingers and Hershey's but don't take any apples is what they basically told us.

    Same here.

    Really, though, it sounds like a tactic the candy companies could use to sell more candy. And The American Dental Association was probably in the back ground clapping their hands with glee. Go Candy Companies. Rah Rah Rah.

    #175 4 years ago
    Quoted from Darscot:

    I do concede vaping nicotine as a means to break the addiction should be legal but heavily monitored and not for sale to the general public.

    Well now, do that and vaping turns from a real cheap cessation tool to another expensive option for industry to dig deep into your pockets. Vaping is cheap. It was a very cheap way for me to kick the addiction. I would hate to see "cheap" go away. Start monitoring it like it is Fort Knox and smoking will look cheap.

    OTOH, a pack of smokes is thru the roof so I can see where an adolescent would trend toward vaping instead of smoking.

    What I can't yet understand is why kids think vaping looks cool. I mean, with a cigarette there are all sorts of dramatic uses for cigarettes. ARe you in the middle of an intense conversation that you would like to slow down? Pull out a pack of smokes and fiddle around with all the ways a cigarette can be manipulated before you get back to the conversation. With a vape stick I can see no dramatic effect at all.

    1 week later
    #204 4 years ago

    What puzzles me with this vaping is that it has been going on for several years. So why all the problems all of a sudden.? Not all of these (teenage) vapers have doing this long term so no one can say we are now seeing the long term effects of vape use.

    To me, the main questions would be:

    1) Are these people who ran out of luck mixing their own vape juice?

    or

    2) Is this new problem effecting those who are using the Juul type pods only?

    The juice has been around for awhile. The pods are a new item.

    #206 4 years ago

    Altria owns 37% of Juul.

    Check this out.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/04/business/iqos-us-launch/index.html

    " Vaping is in crisis. Smoking is taboo. Altria has a solution: Iqos, an electronic cigarette-like gadget that heats, but doesn't burn tobacco. Philip Morris has been selling Iqos for a while in international markets. Altria will distribute Iqos in the United States for the first time Friday. The timing couldn't be better for the new nicotine product, as scrutiny grows around smokeless alternatives like e-cigarettes."

    " The opening follows the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Iqos in April. The agency allowed the Iqos to go on sale because it produces "fewer or lower levels of some toxins than combustible cigarettes." Regulators also "placed stringent marketing restrictions" on the product, including FDA approval of its ads. "

    " Unlike Juuls and other vapes, Iqos uses actual tobacco...."
    ===========================

    The Regulators: We can't let this vaping shut down the entire U.S. tobacco industry, can we?" How are we going to shut down vaping and keep tobacco viable? Anybody got any ideas?

    1 week later
    #209 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    To my knowledge, the only vape company owned by the government is Juul.

    Do you have a link for this claim? Because the rest of your post leaves me confused.

    Lemme see. The government owns Juul. Juul seems to be the king in selling flavored vapes. And therefore the government is trying to ban itself from selling flavored vapes. Please tell how this works.

    #211 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    To my knowledge, the only vape company owned by the government is Juul. And that is why you only see "flavored" ejuices being targeted. It really makes no sense. Why ban only flavored vapes. If people are dying from something and it hasnt been linked to a flavor.... The answer is that the government is using these illnesses to push their agenda, as always.

    Quoted from cottonm4:

    Do you have a link for this claim? Because the rest of your post leaves me confused.
    Lemme see. The government owns Juul. Juul seems to be the king in selling flavored vapes. And therefore the government is trying to ban itself from selling flavored vapes. Please tell how this works.

    Quoted from Rager170:

    If all the other vape companies cannot sell their flavored vapes, that leaves Juul the king of tobacco flavored vaping. I was not aware that Juul was big on the scene for its flavored pods..

    I'm sorry. Let's do one thing at a time.

    You made the claim that Juul is owned by the government. Can you back that claim up with any kind of link? Or are you just BS'n ?

    #214 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    I do assume you realize that Altria is Phillip Morris..

    I do. Your assumption is correct.

    So, are you going to stand by your statement that, "the only vape company owned by the government is Juul." ? Or did you by chance mis-speak?

    #241 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    It was in the link given by cottonm4

    Are you talking about this? "The Regulators: We can't let this vaping shut down the entire U.S. tobacco industry, can we?" How are we going to shut down vaping and keep tobacco viable? Anybody got any ideas?"

    I'm sorry. That was me just making something as a parody of how the Feds must be thinking. I could have made it more clear, I guess. Sorry you missed it.

    #244 4 years ago
    Quoted from Rager170:

    The government has always had an interest in Phillip Morris due to how much money they get from them.

    Yes. But that does not mean the government owns P-M.
    ==============================================

    Mississippi wanted little do to with casinos and would only let the casinos anchor slot machine laden barges to the shore line in Biloxi. Then Katrina hit. All of the barge casinos were wiped out during the hurricane. The casinos told Mississippi they were not coming back unless they could move onto land.

    All of Mississippi's bible thumpers figured the money met more to them than gamblers living in sin so the laws were passed and the casinos landed.

    You are right the government has an interest in P-M. Don't let all this stop-smoking shit fool you. The government would fall to its knees if everybody stopped smoking. And anything tobacco, the government likes; From the seeds in the ground to the cellophane wrapper on the pack. It is revenue. It generates taxable dollars. Big taxable dollars. From tires and trucks and fuel; From the paper and the printing ink. The government is not going to shut down tobacco. Too much money at stake. Too many jobs are at stake.

    Don't forget all of the convenience stores that would have to close if they did not have a wall of cigarettes to sell. Which leads to the question: How come big tobacco always gets the bad rap but the convenience stores get a free ride?

    Vaping threatens all of that revenue and the taxes generated. Hence my parody statement: The government has to come up with something to shut vaping down. So, either it finds some way to jack vaping taxes way up there, or someway to shut vaping down completely.

    How convenient for the Feds that all of a sudden, a product that does not seem to have caused a problem until very recently is getting front page news about teenagers coughing up blood and rolling over dead. It has to be teenagers. No one would care about some dried up old fart one cough away from his gravesite. It's for the children, ladies and gentlemen. It is all for the children.

    While at the same time, over in the UK, vaping is being championed as a valid tool to help people quit smoking. Is there a difference? I say yes. The U.S. has a very big tobacco industry to protect and no government healthcare. The U.K. has no tobacco industry to protect and has nationwide health care. The U.K. has everything to gain by people stopping smoking. The U.S.; Not so much.

    #246 4 years ago
    Quoted from robotron911:

    SKB has a smoking cessation product.

    Got a couple of questions: Let me reiterate, I am not defending tobacco, Big Tobacco, or vaping. But they are here and they exist. They are not going away.

    What is SKB? Never heard of it. How much does its cessation product cost? What kind of product is it? Patch? Gum? Injection?

    I smoked for 46 years and tried everything except Chantix to quit.

    Gum, patches, Beechnut, Redman, nothing did it for me. Except vaping. 4 months of vaping from 16 ml or mg (I forget which) of nicotine down to zero and after 46 years I was smoke free and nicotine free. The vaping cost me about $100.00 total.

    The gum costs 33.00 at Walmart for 170 pieces. On Amazon, a box of Juicy Fruit gum, 180 sticks costs $17.98. From my vaping experience, i know the nicotine does not cost all that much. And it leaves me wondering why a box of nicotine gum costs 84% more than a box of Juicy Fruit?

    Where is the extra cost coming from? Is the government laying a hefty tax on nicotine gum, as well? Sort like sticking it to the smokers for all they are worth?

    I know everybody has to make a living. I get that. But how much does the SKB product cost?

    The gum sure is no bargain; While vaping, for someone motivated to quit, is poor man's "get out of jail card" so to speak. Or at least it will be until the government figures out how to lay on the sin taxes.

    #251 4 years ago

    I am not favorable to considering the vape360.com as a trusted source for honest information.

    The place is selling vape products, therefore, vape360 is predisposed to providing only "happy" news about vape products. It is not going to print any information that might kill sales.

    Is is sort of like reading a glowing report about some product in a magazine; The report tells you about how great XYZ is and then you turn the page and now see a two page advertisement for the fantastic product you just read about.

    You should consider another source.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider cottonm4.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/feds-ban-flavored-vape-liquid-cigarettes-fine?tu=cottonm4 and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.