(Topic ID: 116972)

EM showdown Jumping Jack versus Super Straight

By Pdxmonkey

9 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 15 posts
  • 6 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 9 years ago by cfh
  • No one calls this topic a favorite

You

Linked Games

Topic poll

“Super Straight or Jumping Jack”

  • Super Straight 2 votes
    40%
  • Jumping Jack 3 votes
    60%

(5 votes by 0 Pinsiders)

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

image-734.jpg
image-227.jpg
image-972.jpg
image-797.jpg
image.jpg

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider cfh.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

#11 9 years ago

jumping jack is very rape-able. if you can time it right, knocking the cabinet right when the ball is to eject from the top hole can force it back to the hole. do this over and over. for this reason we can't use it in any leagues or tourneys unless we put the tilt on stupid tight.

super straight is a really fun game. it's not a gottlieb however. sonics are known for much value, but i like super straight a lot.

#15 9 years ago

a lot of guys don't know about the JJ rape feature. the sharpes probably never played any em before your game! also yes it is game dependent, but i've seen accomplished EM players do it on different JJ games.

Promoted items from Pinside Marketplace and Pinside Shops!
From: $ 1.00
Playfield - Other
Rocket City Pinball
 
3,500
Machine - For Sale
Alpine, CALIFORNIA

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider cfh.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/em-showdown-jumping-jack-versus-super-straight?tu=cfh and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.