After reading many of the posts of recent Game of Thrones release and the hope for a Ghost Busters game - threads, it got me wondering are Stern taking a bit too long in introducing new innovation like new game features, lcd screens (whether big or small or Dutch Pinball DMD sized). The Game of Thrones was a massive shock to people in the way of expectations not being met on a few levels - art, severely chopped down Pro, no LCD, lack on wow factor of game features / interactive toys. It is like they are holding onto older tehnology and haven't really advanced pinball a lot in the last 10 years.
I am not bashing them and really appreciate them holding of the pinball torch for so many years, nor wishing for them to slip behind but I hope they will not be over taken as there are a few newer companies proving they have the talent to do some great work with innovation in a number of areas, with production being their hurdle. Stern have the production but with constant price changes and the consistent trimming down of Pro's value for money the competitors are closing up.
I connected Gottlieb as from what I can gather they were the market leaders in the 70's but Bally overtook them and didn't look back for many years as they introduced change and innovation. Yes Gottlieb followed and came out with so decent games but they seem to be less demanded as collector machines. So I am happy with JJP, DP, Heighway, P3 and other companies to climb the ladder and be recognised for innovation, great art and great build quality and just hope that Stern don't leave their change too late as they may start to lose support to some degree.
Some of Stern's games had outstanding art like Metallica and Kiss and then really take a step back on GoT which had 18 months of development time, which shows you that not just a theme sells games, it needs cool iconic art, rules, toys and innovation at a reasonable price.
Also for me I don't understand why they still practice the 3 game levels as yes a reduction of toys will reduce a build cost but writing different rules, having different playfield designs, stocking a wider range of toys will cost them in stock and overall project cost. I still believe a Pro should have the same gameplay as a LE and scrap the Premium, but the LE only be different in looks with limited number of art packages - like plastics, back glass, cabinet art, apron, topper, wire form ramps and an authorised number plate. Some people will argue that a Pro will cost more but I don't agree as imagine the different programming that goes into a game for say a Pro having dots and Premium and LE with LCD (guessing the next base) - look at the money they must pump into programmers full time working and reworking all the different revisions sometimes a few years later. Considering Stern are well known for massive delays in programming it shows that this is a cost that affects the potential of the end product and potential sales. If it wasn't for the programming legends of Lyman Sheats who cleans up lots of the games in his own time there would be a lot of games not playing to the potential that they are doing now.
I think a different way to introduce a Premium type of game is offer accessories through their dealers who can upgrade the pro's to a premium status like, graphic blades, mirror blades, trim packages, aprons, toppers, plastic sets, wire form ramps instead of plastic ramps, quality mods. Just like cars people can upgrade their cars to look and be like a LE but it would actually cost more than a LE when pick and choosing.
I hope Stern can start to show us some innovation in some cool iconic games and not pull down such massive potential sellers and make games that all play the same with the same game play features like Heighway and JJP.
For anyone interested here is the thread for the GB game
https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/official-stern-ghostbusters-speculation-thread