Can't sue the vaccine companies for injuries sustained by the vaccines. Interesting....

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-vaccine-ruling-parents-cant-sue-drug-makers-for-kids-health-problems/

That's NWO agenda 2030 talk. Get some TIME magazines from 10+ years ago to get a good laugh at all the fear porn they put out and how NONE of it has come to pass.

Woa...wait...what? You must be talking about North Korea? Oh that's right, California. Somehow not surprised.

My body, my choice.

Next you'll be telling us that our government fluoride program isn't because they love us so much as to put a topical treatment into our water supply to have whiter teeth?

Oh but it is necessary. For Big Pharma's bottom line....

Year ago it was a chicken in every pot.

Now it is a CVS on every street corner shilling for "free" shots.

Look up Polio and it's vaccine creation years ago. They aren't telling you the entire story.

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/07/vaccine-derived-polio-on-the-rise/

Well how else can Sandra Bullock get her face to look so young? You want to deprive her of baby foreskin blended up youth face serum?
Hater.

Benjamin Franklin said it best:
"You give up a bit of freedom for a bit of safety, you deserve neither the freedom nor the safety."

I believe it because I read it on wikipedia.

Ole Benny Franklin had his problems though. Far far from perfect. But had some great quotes.

climate change subject is VERY politically charged.

And beyond.

Truth in names: Degenerate

Yup. And no Monsanto....errr...I mean Bayer need apply.

Maybe you want a foreign substance with dubious ingredients mainlined into your veins from manufactures that don't stand behind their product,
but I sure don't.

Trust your media. Remember the swine flu vaccine and the big push for it?

I've found it best to do what Oprah and Ellen and the rest of the unholywood elite advise me to do:

But they DO complain. I know some of them. They would rather wear the surgical mask every day to work than take the shot concoction full of who knows what. Ever read the insert for the shot? Please do so before getting stuck with it.

True "science" is never settled. We are always learning and always changing what we believed to be settled science over the years.

Straw man argument

Fear porn. Fear always sells product. It's a money making scheme at best and a debilitating dose of poison at the worst...

Hmmmm. Nasa you say? (Never A Straight Answer)

But but but the "science" and the "research".

If they said jumping off a bridge will keep you from getting the flu would you do that too?

Ah yes. Another Vox Day fan and Owen Benjamin fan. Good to know you brother. =)

Please check back with us in a month or so....

Pinball Restoration Bear here with warm greetings of crushing it style Logos.

Yes, crushing it here near Boston. =)

Again another strawman argument.

Seat belts don't have side effects and aren't required to go into your blood stream and yes are HEAD and SHOULDERS more effective than the faux flu shot.

Yup typical low info thinker aren't you? Google? lol

Let me guess, You are probably a snopes guy too?
Try Duck Duck Go instead and take those blinders off.

Don't forget the Aluminum industry chemical waste product Fluoride for your child's young teeth and even gums. My sister gave the thumbs up to her child's dentist to give Fluoride paste treatment to her 8 month old. Fluoride is a neurotoxin. Good old Edward Bernays. For your safety....

So would the global cabal elitists. Look up Georgia Guidestone...

And if you happen to love abortion and vaccines, you're in luck:

Human babies have been and are still being sacrificed for use in the research and development of vaccines. DNA from these aborted fetuses is present in vaccines, and independent scientific research has found that there is the potential for insertional mutagenesis to occur within the vaccinated person. Unfortunately, vaccine manufacturers do not test their products for mutagenic potential. The long term adverse effects of using aborted fetal cells for vaccine production are virtually unknown, yet millions of these vaccines are administered every day.

For a more comprehensive list, visit Cogforlife.org.
https://thinklovehealthy.com/2017/07/06/what-you-should-know-about-human-aborted-fetal-cell-dna-in-vaccines/

Yup. I don't drink that poison either.

Adrenochrome. It is THE drug of choice for the satanic elite.

The latest stat here says 49% nay to 42% yay.

And don't get us started on Christmas. That is a whole other discussion....

These asshats in white lab coats couldn't even get what they are shooting into their patients correct but hey...they did have white lab coats on so should be absolutely trusted:

BARTLESVILLE, Okla. (AP) — Ten people at an Oklahoma care facility for people with intellectual disabilities were hospitalized after they were apparently accidentally injected with what's believed to be insulin rather than flu shots, authorities said.

Emergency responders were called Wednesday afternoon to the Jacquelyn House in Bartlesville, about 40 miles (65 kilometers) north of Tulsa, on a report of an unresponsive person and found "multiple unresponsive people," Bartlesville Police Chief Tracy Roles said.

The facility had contracted with an experienced pharmacist to administer the influenza vaccine, Roles said, but all received injections of what's believed to be insulin instead. Roles said the pharmacist is cooperating with police but that investigators believe it was an accident.

The eight residents and two staff members were taken to a Bartlesville hospital, and officials said that all have either been released or will be soon.

"I've never seen where there's been some sort of medical misadventure to this magnitude," Roles said. "It could have been worse. Not to downplay where we are, but thinking of where we could be, it certainly could have been very tragic."

Your timing is impeccable. =)

Pro my body my choice more is more accurate this mock-up

What's "scary" is the term "Conspiracy Theorist" was thrown out there by the CIA in the mid 60's when people weren't buying the official Kennedy assassination story...

Better than pretending to be a know it all asshat. Which appears to be your choice.

You have that backwards. I'd wager most vaccine band wagoners support the killing of the unborn some even after it makes it out of the womb trying to gets it's first breath.

Because both are the main stream indoctrinated stance.

I got 2 as I was fearful the first wasn't strong enough. Thank "goodness" for media marketing.

Ask Bill Gates:

"Science" is replete with fraud and bought and paid for skewing of data.

Engineering on the other hand is fact and the real deal.

You believe in Dinosaurs? Cavemen? Bwahahaa! Seriously? Santa Clause too?
The indoctrination runs deep. You may win the Most Easily Mind Controlled award at the Thanksgiving dinner table. Congrats.

Polio? Glad you brought that up.

Interesting info around Dr. Jonas F. Salk.

For the first half of the 20th century, it was believed that Poliomyelitis virus could not be grown in tissue cultures, but then in 1954, a group of Harvard scientists, Enders, Weller and Robbins, won the Nobel Prize for physiology and medicine for exactly that – growing the virus in tissue cultures.

And because viruses require living tissue for their development, these scientists used Rhesus monkey kidneys, and Dr. Jonas F. Salk tested out his wild concoctions on the monkeys.

Within months, five major pharmaceutical firms helped Salk conclude that the concoction could work for humans, and the “formula” was handed over to Eli Lilly & Company and Cutter Labs in Berkeley, California.

Unfortunately, the formula was comprised of new strains of polio that Salk had helped create through wild experimentation, and this would soon be infecting the people that “science-based medicine” was supposed to be protecting from the very infectious disease they were getting injected by US doctors, and new strains of it at that.

What do I believe? You have faith in what you are told and indoctrinated with all your life.
So what do I KNOW to be FACT?: There are NO dinosaur bones. Check your local museum that has "Dinosaurs" on display. Ask them. They will tell you that they are all composite materials NOT bones let alone Dinosaur bones. You see, we are told that they are "radioactive" and would be dangerous to display and or handle. Convenient...

Science! (Bought and paid for)

In the 1960s, the sugar industry funded research that downplayed the risks of sugar and highlighted the hazards of fat, according to a newly published article in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The article draws on internal documents to show that an industry group called the Sugar Research Foundation wanted to "refute" concerns about sugar's possible role in heart disease. The SRF then sponsored research by Harvard scientists that did just that. The result was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1967, with no disclosure of the sugar industry funding.

The sugar-funded project in question was a literature review, examining a variety of studies and experiments. It suggested there were major problems with all the studies that implicated sugar, and concluded that cutting fat out of American diets was the best way to address coronary heart disease.

The authors of the new article say that for the past five decades, the sugar industry has been attempting to influence the scientific debate over the relative risks of sugar and fat.

"It was a very smart thing the sugar industry did, because review papers, especially if you get them published in a very prominent journal, tend to shape the overall scientific discussion," co-author Stanton Glantz told The New York Times.

Money on the line

In the article, published Monday, authors Glantz, Cristin Kearns and Laura Schmidt aren't trying make the case for a link between sugar and coronary heart disease. Their interest is in the process. They say the documents reveal the sugar industry attempting to influence scientific inquiry and debate.

The researchers note that they worked under some limitations — "We could not interview key actors involved in this historical episode because they have died," they write. Other organizations were also advocating concerns about fat, they note.

There's no evidence that the SRF directly edited the manuscript published by the Harvard scientists in 1967, but there is "circumstantial" evidence that the interests of the sugar lobby shaped the conclusions of the review, the researchers say.

For one thing, there's motivation and intent. In 1954, the researchers note, the president of the SRF gave a speech describing a great business opportunity.

If Americans could be persuaded to eat a lower-fat diet — for the sake of their health — they would need to replace that fat with something else. America's per capita sugar consumption could go up by a third.

But in the '60s, the SRF became aware of "flowing reports that sugar is a less desirable dietary source of calories than other carbohydrates," as John Hickson, SRF vice president and director of research, put it in one document.

He recommended that the industry fund its own studies — "Then we can publish the data and refute our detractors."

The next year, after several scientific articles were published suggesting a link between sucrose and coronary heart disease, the SRF approved the literature-review project. It wound up paying approximately $50,000 in today's dollars for the research.

One of the researchers was the chairman of Harvard's Public Health Nutrition Department — and an ad hoc member of SRF's board.

But but but...Bill Nye the nonsensical pseudo science actor guy said there are way more than 2. He wears a white lab coat so he must be correct and above all trusted well.... because: SCIENCE!

Yeah? You now agree that there are no Dino bones and you are still playing?

Do you trust critical thinkers or the paid to lie and or indoctrinated?

How do you know? Did you know that the "scientists" say they are radioactive therefore can not be handled nor touched/viewed?

Don't worry, waking up isn't so scary after a while. It will be ok. I promise.

I should be asking you. Why duck and throw this back at me? You first please.

Ok I'll be the bigger man and answer you. THERE WERE NO DINOS so no men didn't ride them.

Your turn.

How do you KNOW it was a real dino bone? Someone in a white lab coat told you it was?
FACT: Curators say they are radioactive that is why museums don't carry "real" ones.

Throughout its history, The Guardian has always been a left-wing publication as they have stated in various articles.

The story selection favors the left. They utilize emotionally loaded headlines such as “The cashless society is a con – and big finance is behind it” and “Trump back-pedals on Russian meddling remarks after outcry”. The Guardian typically utilizes sources such as thoughtco.com, gov.UK, HuffPost, independent.co.uk, and the Miami Herald.

A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 72% of The Guardian’s audience is consistently or mostly liberal, 20% Mixed and 9% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that The Guardian is strongly preferred by a more liberal audience.

Sounds about right....

Dino bones? No.

Shocking atheists never seem to amaze me how butt hurt they are that THEY aren't their own god.

Why not make fun of Buddah? Or Allah? Or Shiva?

Ok. Time to make fun of your god:

http://bestanimations.com/Balls&Buttons/Buttons/shakira-pressing-button-funny-animated-gif.gif#.Xd2kzjxj5GI.link

vape (resized).jpg

Not getting sucked in by your hate trap any longer.

Wishing you a happy and blessed Thanksgiving.

May you live a thousand years.