Quoted from iceman44:I think that is a good idea, let the people who actually pay for the first 500 get the pins and limit it to one per customer...problem solved....
But the non-lawyers saying this isn't a "contract" just don't know what they are talking about, sorry, but it is a valid contract the way you guys are currently doing it....when you send a quote simply make the offer conditional on the ability to fulfill the order through the supplier and state how you will handle shortages....
Its offer, acceptance, with consideration...a contract, like it or not unless you the seller elaborate on the terms and would be wise to do so.....cya....
As one of the non-lawyers I understand the legal definition of the verbal agreement as stated.
But the grey area here is the nature of the LE product itself and how it's distributed. The definition of the LE is to be considered when attempting the purchase. No doubt Stern screwed their distributors but it's within their rights to do what they please with their product, like it or not.
But there is more than one side in this issue. I do not know what agreements have been made between Stern and their distributors as well as Stern and Metallica.
Stern made the mistake, imo, when offering the LE model on the Metallica fan site. They should have only have offered the Premium and Pro. I would be interested to know how many pinheads bought the LE version versus a Metallica fan that just wanted to have a shiny Metallica related item found on their fan page. But again, Sterns decision to do so and within their rights.
Stern did not force anyone to sell their current pinball machines to make room or raise funds for the LE product. It's a shame this occurred and I feel bad for those it happened to. Stern is not repsonsible for your personal finances and cannot be blamed. People in so mnay other threads tell us to "quit whining about prices" and "get a better job".
As pinball in general is seeing a resurgence, it's dissapointing to see any discussion of a lawsuit against a manufacturer or it's distributors that is currently a victim of their own success. I'm not defending what Stern did. It's a no win situation for them. They can't produce more LE's as it would de-value the product and reduce any further credibility with the LE concept.
We can all hope Stern and every other possible manufacturer that's brining the LE product to the market learn from this situation.
The nature of the LE is what it is. Sueing people is not going to change what has occurred.