Quoted from mg81:

Just for the sake of argument contract law would likely say, the loss could be the difference in the contract price (what PinFever's original contract price was to purchase) and the current market price at the time PinFever learned the contract was being cancelled (repudiated) by the seller plus incidental damages.
This is a fairly common issue in contract law with rising market as sellers try to capture top dollar for their items.
But all of that being said, lots of unknowns, like what terms were actually in your contract that would let them break the deal, probably plenty. Also the split in values will likely be more than consumed in attorney's fees.

Quoted from mg81:

Eryeal, fully agree with what you are saying. I have no idea what the OP originally "contracted" or if a contract even existed. I don't know what the purchasing of a game from a distributor looks like in practice.
I just find it interesting that most people feel a seller offering a "full refund" if an item is not delivered is always OK. Can you imagine in industry if companies let shit like that go unchecked?
Example: Power plant contracts to buy X amount of coal for $10 million for delivery in 1 year, they even prepay. One year later coal prices double. The seller of coal says to the power plant, "Sorry, here is your money back we don't want to sell you the coal anymore." Do you think the power plant would just smile, bend over the barrel and take it?
Once again I am not saying the OP even had a contract like in the example, but most of the other posters seem to feel that even in my above example the power plant should also smile and move on without complaint.