Quoted from Hapidance:
do you know if the sticker for the side of the Ferris wheel for the hurricane will fit the cyclones Ferris wheel?
Both Cyclone's and Hurricane's Ferris wheels has the same base part number, the only physical difference between them is the color of the plastic. Cyclone's one is red while Hurricane has two, a red and a blue one.
So Yes, the sticker for the side of the Ferris wheel for the hurricane will fit the cyclones Ferris wheel.
By the way, the Blue, Red and Green Williams Parts Catalogs are a more reliable source for parts quantities and p/n than the individual machines parts manual from my experience. Items from Marcospeciality are still listed or at least refers to the original P/N if obsoleted listed from those Catalogs. In short, those are the best tools you can use when looking for specific or unlisted parts and even sometimes (too frequently to my taste) parts misidentified in the parts manual.
---
(I'm not sure if I'll do it, but I'll may possibly create a dedicated topic for this post, we'll see if I have the time)
Continue reading if you wish to know more behind the hypothetical meaning of the wheels part number.
Or maybe you are just geek of factory standards and a bit fanatic of the way's of doing that makes the backbones of a company, which may be weird for some buuuuut I don't care. You do you, I do me. It's not my fault if you feel like you wasted your time reading something you don't even care about.
---
Maybe I'm wrong on this, but at least it's logical. Don't quote me on that tho, I haven't verified if it applies to all similar situations!
So here's my thinking:
First, we need to make sure that the Ferris wheels from Cyclone and Hurricane have the same (or a similar) part number.
If we compare the P/N from each Ferris wheels in the Blue (p.5-35) and the Red (p.7-38) William's Parts Catalog, we can tell that both machines uses the exact same part red wheel baring the same P/N, 03-8124, and that Hurricanes also uses a variation of that P/N which is affiliated to the blue wheel, 03-8124-1.
From that fact, we can clearly tell that both color variations bares the same base part number, 03-8124.
So here's where the theory begins.
We know for a fact that Cyclone (1988) came out before Hurricane (1991), so the red wheel logically has the initial production part number baring the no dash number (or the -0 if you feel calling it that way). Following that logic, when a part is based on an already produced design and only has a variation that won't affect the tooling/the mold (I'll come back to that latter) like the color of the plastic or a print applied on the part, the identification of that part will bare the originals P/N with a -X, -1 in our case, added at the end which would means variation 1 for production. This way of doing leads to cost savings in many departments like engineering (no new part to design), production (no new tools to design, make or buy. Maybe there was even a ton of already made replacements parts that didn't sold as intended on the aftermarket), aftermarket (more profitable to produce parts that are used on more than one machine) and so on.
About that tooling thing I mentioned previously, you may remember that Pin-bot and Jack-bot are almost literally the same machines. Following my theory, you may be thinking that the spiral ramps from those two would bare the same base part number since the black one from Jack*Bot should be a variation (-1) of the red ramp (-0) from Pinbot right? Well you would be wrong since both ramps don't use the same base P/N or even refer to each other P/N.
-Black Ramp: A-20080 SPIRAL ASSEMBLY RAMP
-Red Ramp: B-11152 VORTEX CORKSCREW RAMP
So why is that? Well if you didn't knew, Jack*Bot spiral ramp design is slightly different than the one from it's predecessor since the top of the red ramps was prone to breaking over time. Therefore, since the thickness of the guide at the top of the ramps was greater on the redesigned part, it meant that the original molds from the first P/N couldn't be used without them at least being retooled to fit the new required shape. And I'm not talking of a mold being retooled because of wear, by retooling I mean modifying for a part with different requirement (shape, size, definition). And since that meant new dimensions, it meant new planning for the production and new documents for that parts. In that case, the base P/N drives the shape and the dimensions which drives the tooling design, production planning (more on that at the end), inspection and many more which all related doc probably are identified with a similar P/N. If the base design is revised, then it's easy and takes less time and effort to flowdown the changes since each dash number refer to the no dash documents.
In a nutshell, if a parts doesn't change in shape or form, a variation (dash No.) is made in order to use the same process than the original first production release part (no dash/[-0]) to cut cost, save time and be more effective.
Oh and I can already, from the confort of my living room while eating a fresh made poutine (as all good true Quebecois do), hear some of you saying from across the border: "Then please tell us why is the reproduction spiral ramps still using the same B-11152 P/N and not A-20080-1 even tho we know that they were made from A-20080 SPIRAL ASSEMBLY RAMP mold used by Williams (or its subsidiary) during the production of Pinbot?"
Let me put down my still unfinished poutine a second (which is be considered as a sacrilege by many) to let me give you the following answer:
Go read a bit about the Williams/Bally Licence owned by Planetary Pinball please.
http://www.planetarypinball.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=WB_LICENSE
http://www.planetarypinball.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=ABUS
Other than that, from what I can tell, the naming convention of part at Williams only apply to parts produced and designed by Williams up till they ceased producing titles in the Pinball market. Reproduction parts will still use the original P/N even if there are some changes made to the part only because a third party is producing genuine replacement part of an already existing design under licence of Williams Electronics Games, Inc.
Which, in a nutshell means, the third party owns the exclusive right to produce a Williams/Bally replacement part (that is functionally speaking a copy of the original design) for a define or indefinite amount of time. If Williams Electronics Games, Inc. was still in the pinball market and they were the one that produced a replacement red ramps, I'm quite sure and I would bet on that, it would be identified A-20080-1.
Another thing that supports my theory is the fact that the color of the part is always at the end of the part's naming if included in the description, whether it's between parenthesis or after a comma. The Ferris wheel (#03-8124), pop bumper caps (03-9007-XX, 03-8254-XX, 03-7444-XX, etc) and star posts (03-7542-XX) are some great examples.
About production planning, you can tell that the P/N does follow a pattern betweens parts and within assembly.
For instance, the next higher assembly for A-20080 SPIRAL ASSEMBLY RAMP is A-20080-D RAMP W/DECALS which only adds -D(ecals).
Other parts that are specific to and of the same final assembly are all named under a similar patern or family. For example, parts within the Ferris wheel assembly are all named with parts number close to each other and have a logic behind them that I won't get into:
03-8124 Ferris wheel
03-8125 Cover, Ferris wheel
03-8126 Washer
03-8145 Drive belt
B-11571-1 Motor assembly
B-11899 Bracket assembly
Here are some of the families (Defined in coordination with a subsidiary or totally by Williams designers) you can find:
Some General Parts Family;
01-... Brackets and sheet metal parts
02-... Machined parts
03-... plastic parts
10-... Springs
Some Assemblies Family:
A-... Structure/Bracket Assembly
B-... Mechanical Assembly
C-... Electronic Boards or Assembly
H-... Wiring/Harness Assembly
It's a bit messy right now but there's a lot of useful things to learn from p/n and their naming conventions within a company.