(Topic ID: 249870)

Continued playfield issues with JJP and Stern

By f3honda4me

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 9,207 posts
  • 704 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 66 days ago by PinMonk
  • Topic is favorited by 177 Pinsiders
  • Topic is sticky in its sub-forum

You

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

B47B97EA-8C60-4AB2-82E1-941265D53DCF (resized).jpeg
E51185C3-D30B-46BA-ABE3-0D2C1472D3FF (resized).jpeg
AC060B74-B84E-4C3C-9A87-454A9BFB2FC5 (resized).jpeg
Pinside_forum_7592500_0 (resized).jpg
Pinside_forum_7592500_2 (resized).jpg
Pinside_forum_7592500_1 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221008_211349 (resized).jpg
Capture2 (resized).PNG
IMG20221008031914 (resized).jpg
IMG20221008032533 (resized).jpg
IMG20221008033119 (resized).jpg
IMG20221008034651 (resized).jpg
20220919_071252 (resized).jpg
IMG_20220820_032754 (resized).jpg
IMG_20220820_025439 (resized).jpg
20210920_172949 (resized).jpg

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider utesichiban.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

#289 4 years ago
Quoted from razorsedge:

C'mon everyone, we all know how capitalism works, don't we? ... ever increasing profit margins and ever increasing cut corners and exclusions all while the price rises. Nothing unexpected, they don't make 'em like they used to. Real quality wood, and taking the time and care required for superior quality product have gone to the wayside, so that things can continue on the essential growth curve! . Capitalism is just the best isn't it!
I made the choice never to buy another new in box stern after the horrendous dimpling that happened to my n.i.b. ACDC Prem VE. It warranted a replacement Decent playfield in my opinion, but I was brushed of by the stern dealer along with the likes of the man Steve himself who claimed it was "normal". Besides if the playfield was replaced it would just be the same s#it quality p/f to replace it. I sold the POS, I would get another as I think it's a great game, but I will buy an original run that has a playfield made with more care and decent hard wood. Also bonus get a propper backbox latch, backbox, and real lockdown reciever. Stern especially have taken Cheap and Nasty to the Next level from all that I've seen. They out do everyone else for cheap, by leagues. What operator is going to be keen to buy a new JP2 that does not eat the ball? . It's the main attraction and what everyone expects from JP... may as well keep the old one or buy a Premium... or was that the plan... less pro's?
Venting sequence complete!

So poor QC is a capitalism issue? Sounds like you are thinking socialism/communism would solve the problem after that rant.

#290 4 years ago
Quoted from Brk_oth:

They don't use multiple suppliers for playfields - all Stern playfields made in the one place.

Didn’t Sterns PF issues start when they lost Churchill cabinets (i.e. - Chicago Gaming) as their supplier?

You have to love pinball. How many industries were making higher quality products at half the price in the 90’s? Maybe not unique to pinball but I have a difficult time understanding how these manufacturers can’t get these problems straightened after all this time. No excuse given what they are charging for these games.

#335 4 years ago
Quoted from razorsedge:

Pmsl! Really??
"Lookout the commies are comming!" hardest I've laughed all week, thanks!
Well yeah! QC costs money! . Pretty much just looks like a more profits and greed/money issue. Nothing can grow forever - Newsflash.
Bigger they get the harder the fall, only takes time.
Pinball doesn't benefit from companies making cheaper and nastier pinball machines, and for ever more money/profit.
Capitalism is just the next dirty C word that's all, didn't you get the memo?
It's all good, globalisation will surely save us, and pinball! Lol
Stern LE are a AU$10k game Max! ... simple ... the rest is just Extra profit than previously (perpetual growth elephant).

Wow, thanks for the clarification,
comrade. LOL.

#386 4 years ago

What a shit show. Is Churchhill cabinets and Chicago Gaming the only company that knows how to make a good playfield?

1 week later
#958 4 years ago
Quoted from PinballTilt:

JJP will make sure any replacement playfields moving forward don't have this soft clear issue. I don't speak for the company and have no inside information, but there is no way they'd send out playfields with issues under this program. Those that already bought and were refunded, those might have this issue still

And how exactly are they going to be able to guarantee that? It sounds like both JJP and Stern both have ongoing issues with current games. Seems to me they still dont have a handle on what or why these issues continue to occur or the problem would already have been remedied.

19
#1013 4 years ago
Quoted from Darscot:

There are plenty of people that are and you only need one buyer. These are the very latest released pins, even in a couple years you are going to have a line up of buyers. If I'm the only guy in the line not trying to get $1000 off because it needs a swap, lucky me and lucky seller. I think people underestimate how many people in pinball spend as much time working on them as playing them.
P.S. Whats a swap going to take 20-30 hours, shit I put more than that into a video game and at the end I just feel like a slob that just spend 30 hours sitting on my ass. I would much rather work on a pin and have a dime piece at the end.

Ridiculous to think or expect most people paying 10k for a new machine have the time or expertise to undertake a big project like that. Bottom line is they shouldn't have to given they just paid a huge amount of money for a brand new product that shouldn't have major parts and/or design flaws to begin with.

I'm glad you have the time and skill to do this on your own but I do think you are in the minority here. Regardless, that really isn't the problem or point. The problem is the time and cost required to do a full playfield swap shouldn't be on a customer who just paid a significant sum of money for a brand new product.

#1014 4 years ago
Quoted from Vyzer2:

Car companies can absorb hundreds of millions in losses....and they have. Pinball companies can not absorb a half a million to a million and continue to be viable.

That may be true but if these issues continue on brand new products from these manufacturers, I think I speak for not only myself but many in the pinball community that I will not buy any game NIB until they have have demonstrated their QC is where it needs to be and they are making games without major defects or design flaws.

I'm sorry but it isn't acceptable for any manufacturer in any industry to charge 7-10k for a product with major defects and then put a huge part of the cost and time required to fix the problem on the customer. Some on this community may be okay with that but I think enough are not that things need to chanfe... soon.

1 week later
#1435 4 years ago
Quoted from Richthofen:

I thought Stern ordered cabinets and playfield a from Churchill, same place CGC did?
http://www.pinballnews.com/learn/churchill/index.html

My understanding is they used Churchhill in the past but haven't in recent years. Probably not a coincidence that all these playfield issues started once they decided to cut costs (or whatever fall out happened with CGC/Churchhill) and started using other PF suppliers.

If I was Chicago Gaming, I would look at all these problems at Stern as a golden opportunity to recruit away some of their designers and start making non-remake pins as well.

CGC's quality on remakes has been clearly the best in the industry in recent years and owning Churchill gives them a big competitive advantage given all the problems at Stern & JJP right now.

1 week later
#1728 4 years ago

If these issues are as widespread on multiple machines as it appears, Stern is looking at possible class action or other lawsuits in the future. These games are too expensive for buyers to lose thousands trying to fix (or lose it on resale) known manufacturing defects.

I just don't understand how Stern never had all these PF issues until 2015ish and now can't seem to fix the problems over several years and machines. Unacceptable.

#1775 4 years ago
Quoted from Durzel:

27 plays! That is just ridiculous.
At a bare minimum people who are buying these pins and then trying to sell them on are going to be asked questions about the pooling etc. If they have pooling and it hasn’t yet developed into chipping or lifting of the artwork then that’s basically asking prospective buyers to shoulder the burden of having to deal with Stern if/when it develops into that, assuming they’ll even deal with it for second hand pins etc.
Those people are buying a pin which is basically instantly devalued from having the pooling there.
I honestly don’t get why people are disregarding this as soon as a new theme is announced. All that achieves is to undermine the efforts of those with this problem who are trying to get it resolved. What lesson is there for Stern if they can just disregard existing owners and sell a new theme to other ones, or - worse - existing owners with the problem are too sucked up in the hype NOT to throw more money at them.
My Stern Tron LE has zero pooling, chipping or lifting. Spending the right amount of money on the playfield wood, artwork and clearing is not beyond the wit of man, they were already doing it years ago. I guess now, like the more conspicuous BOM cost cutting that saw drop targets removed and plastic ramps instead of wireforms, money spent on this stuff got shaved as well.

That long rumored Tron VE may not devalue existing Trons much if any at all if they ever release a VE. The older HUO Trons will always have a better PF (and possibly cabinet as well).

13
#1882 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

Well, if they said it's not widespread, they're not indicating it didn't happen. And again, given the number of pins that were produced, and given we don't know how many have experienced chipping (I'm going to assume that Stern isnt concerned about pooling since it 's only cosmetic), it could absolutely be considered to be "not widespread".
So no, "cover-up" is equally ridiculous and accusatory.
With respect to another posters comments, assuming that all of the pooling will lead to chipping in a few years and demanding playfields be replaced is also absolutely insane. What company is going to spend money, replacing things that aren't broken.
Pinside is nuts. It COULD be the most positive place to discuss pinball, where distributors like Stern COULD ask us for opinions and feedback.
Instead, (and I'm going to quote a friend here) it's a dumpster fire that Stern understandably wants no part of.
From my point of view, you can't accuse them of lying, using words like "cover up" and also expect them to spend thousands of dollars on issues that haven't proven to be a problem yet (pooling), and also criticize them for not announcing every issue they encounter.
Their choice to deal with defects on a case by case basis is the only thing that seems to make sense around here.
You are welcome to be critical of the way they operate, and refuse to spend your hard earned cash on anything they produce.
I on the other hand, am looking forward to picking up a Jurassic Park Premium as soon as possible.
I am currently "out of F(*&s to give" as they say. If you want to hate on Stern, have fun with your Wonkas.
I'm out.

Thanks for chiming in and joining the discussion, Gary.

#1920 4 years ago
Quoted from NeilMcRae:

Do you think Stern don't know that we are concerned or pissed off? I think they do. Otherwise turning around a new play field design for JP in a matter of weeks wouldn't have happened.
It would be a shame to turn a session into a moan and vent session rather than a positive session that helps all pinheads in the medium term.

I think part of their problem is they are trying to do too much too fast. Changing the playfield design really doesnt solve the issue if bad clear is the problem. Over the time there would likely be playfield wear and issues due to the ongoing problem.

They would be smart to stop production altogether until they know exactly how to fix the clear or paint problem and make sure nothing going out going forward is defective. Continuing to risk defective clear and playfields going to even more customers will only become a bigger liability and do more damage to their reputation amongst their customer base.

As for their unwillingness to acknowledge it discuss that a problem even exists, I'm sure that is their lawyers recommendation. The problem is how will those of us that refuse to buy NIB now until we know the problem has been addressed and fixed know it is safe to buy again? I have to think what is going on is significantly impacted their sales on these new pins.

10
#1922 4 years ago
Quoted from yancy:

AKA suicide in the manufacturing business

So continuing to churn out defective product is the better option? I wont touch anything coming off their line right now until they outline what has changed to address the problem.. and even then I'm going to wait at least a year.

12
#1930 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

Thank you for clearly demonstrating your level of knowledge when it comes to pinball manufacturing.
(Your pinball company just went bankrupt FYI)
-your Pal, “Gary”

Thanks again for adding your expert insight to the discussion Gary. We should all just be happy to pay $7000 for a brand new game and just be happy with whatever we get, right?

#1933 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

He accused me of it earlier so I’m just having fun with it.
Thinking more about your view point, I’ll say this:
You have an unrealistic level of expectation from Stern.
They have clearly stated that playfields are not under warranty.
You insist on a perfect playfield.
Neither of you is “wrong” but you have not agreed on this matter.
You appear to feel that Stern is obligated/indebted to provide perfect playfields and that anything less than 100% should be replaced at their expense. Remember that this is Stern pinball we’re talking about. It’s not Sony, Apple, or Toyota.
Yes, they are the biggest pinball manufacturer, but this is an industry that most people don’t even know exists.
There are no Ferrari’s in the parking lot.
Given this inability to agree on a perfect playfield, it’s really best for you to avoid buying new in box, and instead to wait and buy a second hand game that you can inspect, ensuring it’s to your satisfaction.
There’s nothing wrong with that, and it’s not meant to belittle or insult you so I hope you can appreciate the observation.
Quite frankly, it shouldn’t matter one bit to me. But I get annoyed when some people (not saying you), can’t understand that Stern is already offering more than they have committed to, and then try to call them out for lying, sweeping things under the rug, etc etc. They may not be operating to your level of expectation, but that doesn’t mean that they’re deceitful or doing anything wrong.

I think you are missing the point. I think most of everyone posting here would be very happy if Stern just got back to the quality of game they made for 2 decades. These type of playfield issues (ghosting, pooling/chipping, etc ) rarely happened for years and now have increasingly becoming the norm.

It is hardly an unreasonable expectation that a brand new product costing 6-8k not have issues that potentially threaten the long term integrity of the heart of the product (i.e. - playfield) almost out of the box. Your expectations of what constitutes acceptable from a new product from a pinball or other manufacturer is pretty low.

#1937 4 years ago
Quoted from porkcarrot:

Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't follow it that closely, but have they had any issues that affect actually playing the game that they haven't immediate remedied? I get that we all want the machines to be and stay really nice, but ultimately it is still a game made to play. And from what I have seen all these games are still playable. I'm not defending the play field chipping at all, but I will point out that there are games that are 40+ years old with play fields worn to the wood that can still be played with no issue at all.
No one is making anyone pay 6-8K for these. Just don't buy them. If you want them to improve these issues, don't give them any money until they do. I'm disappointed too, I have been selling machines to put that money toward a new JP2. Now I'm not going to do that unless they announce some significant improvement and that sucks. I'm really unhappy about it. But it is still a toy that I'm not going to buy, it isn't that big of a deal really. And to say that they must fix what is ultimately a cosmetic issue for every machine they produced seems excessive to me. Again, just don't buy it.

I agree to a point. Like you, I was going to get a JP2 Premium but will know hold off for a year or so until I'm reassured these issues are definitely resolved.

Sure the games are still playable but that isn't the problem. Fair or not, the problem is the perception that the PF's are going to have extremely expensive and time consuming issues to resolve in the future. That will hurt anyone paying a lot of money for a brand new product whether they keep it for the long haul or try to sell it down the road.

These PF issues have seemingly been a problem since 2015ish. Saying nothing and just accepting it as part of pinball manufacturing won't lead to any meaningful change.

Stern needs to get back to the suppliers and whatever they were doing to make better products pre-2015. The only way that is going to happen is if these issues are known and discussed and buyers start demanding better with their wallets

20
#1939 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

Try to keep up, Utah.
There’s this thing, called “the environment”. And as of late, companies are no longer allowed to use super harsh chemicals because it’s bad for this “environment”. So things have changed.

Here is the thing: just because YOU deem it to be reasonable to expect something, doesn’t mean that the manufacturers are in agreement. In this case, they aren’t. See the warranty if you want evidence.
Your expectations of what constitutes acceptable for a new product from a pinball manufacturer is pretty unrealistic in today’s world.
I LOVE the fact that this has come down to some Pinsiders stating that they demand play field perfection. It makes the discussion so much easier to comprehend. One expectation is not equal to what’s being offered. In this case, the manufacturer has put their commitment in writing. Yours is known only to you and may be subject to change at anytime without notice.

Sorry I mistook you for Gary. I should have realized you were Stern's corporate counsel (the give away is the legalistic, condescending tone).

If you want to take that attitude, fine. Care to explain why CGC can still make quality playfields and games without these issues if it is "environmental" issues that are the main problem?

Either way, Stern needs to improve and fix this (and the perception) or they are going to be losing a lot of business going forward.

#1946 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

Hey, you started with the name calling. Don’t be shocked that I’m now giving back!
With respect to the current state of pinball, I have no idea what CGC uses. You’d have to ask them.
Fingers crossed. So far, JP LE playfields and the most recent Pro models appear to have no issues.
Here’s hoping it was just a bump that was hit, converting to a new process and all this is behind us.

My guess is CGC's playfields are good because they have been making them for year's and know how to do it right. Probably not a coincidence that many of Stern's issues with playfields began when rumor is they changed suppliers from Churchill about the 2015 timeframe.

#2014 4 years ago
Quoted from Chambahz:

What I’ve said all along is that it’s on the buyer to understand the terms of agreement before buying a game.
If Stern was playing by their own rules, they’d tell all the owners with pooling and chipping to pound sand.
(We know that would cost them customers, but that’s not the point right now)
They are working on issues “on a case by case basis” apparently. I hope that means that EVERYONE (pooling or chipping) gets a new play field -but if Stern determines that pooling doesn’t affect gameplay, and if they believe that it won’t always lead to chipping, it’s their right to refuse returns. As a buyer, you should know that before putting your money down.
I’m not telling anyone that they should like this state that we’re in. I’m just pointing out the other side to this.
When Stern has so carefully pointed out that playfields are not all covered by warranty and you get one that’s minorly imperfect, and you start screaming bloody murder... it’s a little naive.
It Would be great to better understand what Stern will and won’t replace before buying.
Maybe that’s something that could be asked at Expo, or the next show.

If it is true Stern is now saying playfields arent covered by their warranty, it is a huge red flag. What that says is they've realized they can't figure out how to make a reliable playfield but want to keep churning out games and profits regardless of what happens and what it looks like both before and after it ships.

I honestly cannot understand what the powers that be at Stern are thinking. They are destroying their company brand and integrity by writing a warranty like that and continuing to churn out problem games.

It is a golden opportunity forc a company like CGC to make a move on Stern and start making solidly built non-remake games of their own.

1 week later
#2166 4 years ago

Does anyone know if any of Stern's recent playfield issues (pooling, chipping, etc) affected Guardians of the Galaxy pins as well? I played one recently and liked it a lot more then I expected. I am now thinking about looking for a premium on the used market if one pops up in my region.

Any insight is very appreciated.

#2174 4 years ago
Quoted from pindude80:

I would say GTG's production definitely falls in that production time of when we are seeing problems. The upside is you are looking for used and won't have to play Stern NIB Roulette. My advice would be to ask the seller to send you a bunch of pictures of the posts, look at them closely, if everything looks good, make the trip, pull the glass, inspect the posts in person and if it looks good take home a GTG but I sure as hell would not being buy new if it were me.

Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you. Won’t be buying anything NIB until I am confident these issues have been truly addressed and resolved.

#2216 4 years ago

Or Chicago Gaming's playfields. Haven't heard many complaints or clear issues with their remakes.

1 week later
36
#2620 4 years ago
Quoted from Vinnie:

Yes Stern sent me a non-populated playfield due to chipping and pooling/blistering. I just received it today. I was told 4-8 weeks but it arrived in less than two. The whole process took about two months from the time I reported it to my distributor until I received the replacement. My machine was less that 3 weeks old when it chipped so that may have been one of the determining factors. I sent a lot of pictures clearly showing the issues. Stern handles these issues on a case by case basis so it takes a while before they make a determination(took a month for my case). Good luck I hope they take care of you.[quoted image]

Am I the only one that thinks sending a unpopulated playfield replacement as a solution for a brand new pin someone paid 6k+ for is unacceptable?

Good grief it would take someone that knows what they are doing 25+ hours to swap a playfield.

#2621 4 years ago

I apologize if this has already been discussed but does anyone know if any of the early run Guardians of the Galaxy games have had these pooling and/or chipping issues?

2 months later
15
#3328 4 years ago
Quoted from Who-Dey:

Anything less than a new populated playfield in your case is totally unacceptable. If your distro cant get that for you i would email and call stern and keep raising hell. Your distributor doesnt sound like much of a fightet, i would dump his or her ass also.

I think a call from a lawyer talking class action with them is more likely to get action than any distributor.

Reading through this thread, I am completely floored and disgusted that a manufacturer of any product costing 6-9k thinks it is acceptable to send out product in this condition and just ignore customers. Stern should be ashamed.

Frankly, if what people are saying is true, they deserve to get hit with many lawsuits... and no, a unpopulated playfield is not an acceptable solution. It is basically cop out and avoidance of any real responsibility as far as I’m concerned.

#3332 4 years ago
Quoted from Durzel:

You need only see the hype about q potential Stranger Things pin coming to see why they persist with this business strategy. If all these complaints don’t actually translate to lost sales they have no incentive to change course.
I sincerely hope that people put their money where their mouth is and restrain themselves whenever these new pins are announced. It’s the only thing that stands to change their attitude, particularly as there is no real competition cranking out pins with the same frequency as them.

I agree. I have played JP2 on location and think it is a great game. I want to buy it myself but there is no way I'm going to roll the dice and throw down 7k + on a Premium knowing how many out there are receiving faulty product and playfields and are being ignored by Stern.

I cant believe anyone would pay that kind of money if they are aware this is an ongoing risk and issue. I learned my lesson buying an early run WOZ thinking because the initial owner replaced the unbuffered boards, the problem would be fixed. I was wrong and it was a year long miserable experience having multiple failures and no solution save being charged almost 1k to buy a 2.0 kit (to be swapped out with my own labor) because of a manufacturer defect that was never addressed to begin with.

I feel bad for those that paid big $$ for NIB and are having to deal with this type of treatment from Stern. It really is unacceptable for a manufacturer in any industry to continue to crank out so many lemons with ongoing known issues and ignore customers or offer subpar solutions.

#3374 4 years ago
Quoted from MrBally:

Gary's education is in the field of Law. He knows what he has and doesn't have to do.

Right. So ignoring upset customers with flawed or defective playfields is the right thing to do if your within the law? Not if you want to keep customers and stay in business long term.

1 month later
#4161 4 years ago
Quoted from DerGoetz:

JJP ordered a perfectly fine playfield from Mirco and paid Mirco in prefectly fine Euros, they are not at fault as a manufacturer for the initial issue.
They are as much victim as the rest of us.

If you really believe that, you understand nothing about manufacturing and business in general. That is like saying Airbus isn't responsible when the Pratt and Whitney engine used in their new plane fails.

15
#4164 4 years ago
Quoted from PinballSTAR:

I give up...
I remind you I only got involved in this because I saw Goetz post that he didn't get his playfield yet. He didn't ask me about it, nothing - I saw the post and I emailed him and Jack to get a status update. From there the lies about the populated playfield started, months after everything started with his claim. I did above and beyond - I inserted myself into the situation to try to HELP him.
To say that he is not wrong to lie here to everyone to extort the company with the deal of give me a $ 3,000 discount on the next game (where was his outrage then - he still wanted another JJP game ? ) with the promise of I'll stay quiet, I'll tell everyone I got an unpopulated playfield and I'm happy with it, etc... Its WRONG. Period. It's wrong to each and every one of you who are looking for adequate solutions. Would you be so kindly about him if you found out today that he got a $ 3,000 discount and you didn't or would you be roasting him ? Please... JJP did the right thing to rebuff him even though it would have been easier to pay him off and shut him up.
This guy is a player and I proved it - he tried playing JJP, he tried playing me, and he tried playing every single one of you ! I did what is in my control as a distributor I put the customer on the path of resolution and I checked later to see if I could do more for him on my own.
Being upset with the PF situation and how he went about it are two separate things..

No offense but saying he tried to play JJP just sounds bad and frankly BS. The one that got played was the customer who paid almost 13k for a defective pinball machine and got screwed.

I too am waiting for you to acknowledge that the true problem and bad actor here is JJP, the manufacturer of a very expensive product that is doing little to nothing to support their customers post sale.

#4165 4 years ago
Quoted from DerGoetz:

You guys are all not reading what I posted....INITIAL
There was no bad intent. How it is being handled after the fact is up to the manufacturer and distributor, and that is what is being discussed here.

I agree with that. What I am saying is that JJP is ultimately responsible for the finished product, period. I think you would agree with that.

Sorry you are having to deal with this. Your story and too many others I'm reading here is why I have decided against buying NIB despite there being a few games out there right now that I have interest in.

#4255 4 years ago
Quoted from Oaken:

It’s all well and good in theory to push responsibility down the production food chain until you get to who is ultimately responsible but in my experience more often then not when you do that as a manufacturer, you put your supplier out of business.
So then you as a manufacturer are still left holding the bag and now you have no more supplier either. Which may or may not put YOU out of business. So what do you do? You turn around and squeeze your customer to just stay alive for one more day. Whether that is the end consumer or yet another manufacturer higher up the food chain than you.
No one wins in these things. Everyone is angry (justifiably so). And all it would have taken to likely prevent this shitshow in the first place was adequate QC.

This is exactly why JJP has taken the stance they have and are screwing over customers. My impression is JJP is bleeding money and cant afford to fix all the screw ups.

My prediction is if this is lndeed the case (which it appears to be), JJP's days are numbered.

#4345 4 years ago
Quoted from Rager170:

They say, go F yourself lol.
Just kidding

Actually, kind of not kidding in most cases

#4353 4 years ago

Does anyone here that owns a Premium or LE JP have any PF issues or know anyone that has?

#4373 4 years ago
Quoted from Yesh23:

After less 90 days and 50 plays on my JP pro with a build date of Aug 22nd. I’ll reach out to Stern tomorrow but first playfield issue with them. I don’t know what to expect.[quoted image][quoted image][quoted image]

That is bad. If Stern says that isn’t worthy of a new, populated PF then no way I feel confident buying anything NIB. When did the LE’s and Premiums go into production??

#4548 4 years ago
Quoted from PanzerFreak:

Some comments from Joe Kaminkow on recent playfield quality when asked about it on the Super Awesome Pinball show.
https://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/id/12947717
"...the clear coat is not glass, it's paint, it's a ball, it's a piece of wood, it will roll, big deal"
"It's a pinball, they wear out, they're mechanical things"
Super Awesome Pinball Show "You haven't noticed a change from before to now in playfield quality"?
"I'm sure from batch to batch the poplar wood changes from what tree was cut down or what the amount of moisture was in the air or the amount of time the hard coat did or how somebody mixed the hard coat with not enough of something, too much of something else but you know it's a pinball machine"
"To quote Gary we are not making heart and lung machines, we are making pinball machines"
"We used to make games where the hard coat would wear out within 90 days"
"For those at home in their underwear and in their wife beaters and drinking PBR and bitch in the words of William Shatner get a life"

Who is the moron that made these comments?.. and if Gary Stern actually said that while selling 6-10k products, it does provide a lot of insight into the mindset of Stern and why they think they don’t really need to do better.

Stern better hope CGC or some other manufacturer doesn’t become a viable competitor because their arrogance, lack of customer focus, and greed will come back and bite them quickly. I’m disgusted they are charging what they do for their products and have that type of attitude from the owner.

#4598 4 years ago
Quoted from romulusx:

I’ll concede the one on one meeting that’s what you do when you really want to put a boot up someone’s ass!I can hear Jack yelling how his reputation of a quality build just went out the fucking window and you knuckle heads will be replacing playfields

Build quality? I made the mistake of buying an early run WOZ from the original owner. JJP sent him all new buffered LED boards to replace the unbuffered faulty originals and supposedly the problem was fixed. In the year I owned it, the replacements continued to fail here and there and it ruined most of the enjoyment from the game. The only fix for pre-2.0 WOZ’s is ultimately the 2.0 light kit and JJP wants $800 for (and you get to do the swap on your own) them.

The led light board issue was due to defective, poor engineering and yes, that falls under build quality. Probably not fair but that experience really soured me on ever buying another JJP or other pin with known manufacturing or PF issues.

#4628 4 years ago
Quoted from romulusx:

Really going all the way back to a 2007 build.So you sold your Emerald Edition WOZ and made your money back?

It was an SE and no, I lost some money. Of course, that isn't the point.

2007? Do your homework on when JJP started making games. It is irrelevant regardless. The point is JJP has had defects on some of their games whether it be electronics or playfields almost from the beginning. I replied to a comment that Wonka and damaged Jack and JJP's reputation for quality.

My problem with JJP and Stern going back to the original WOZ's lightboard issues is they rarely seem to truly fix the manufacturing defects and ultimately provide solutions that putt intensive labor and time fixes on the customer... and customers spending 6-10k for a new game at that.

#4653 4 years ago
Quoted from romulusx:

I guess I’ve been lucky with my Dialed In and Wonka.The DI was trouble free and the few problems with Wonka they helped me thru them.Ive always felt like Frank and Lloyd have been helpful with any issues I had

Their tech support guys were always great when I talked with them. Feel bad for those guys having to constantly walk people through light board issues, etc and then having to try to sell a 2.0 kit to customers whose issues are the result of defects at the factory. Wasn't their faults JJP and Jack won't step up and provide those kits for customers that got problematic early run games.

4 weeks later
#5008 4 years ago
Quoted from JodyG:

Stern has been screwing my friend around for 5 months now after committing to a populated playfield. They won't even give an idea of a date for when he may get his. Current excuse is "machines we are building right now are already sold". Well, TMNT is probably going to be on the line shortly, so that will lead to more excuses. Talking to a lawyer now to go over options.

Stern is definitely not about customer service. All about money and greed.

Pinball needs a few more viable manufacturers to pressure Stern into significantly upping their game and to start giving a rat's ass about the lira customers. I hope Chicago Gaming branches out of just remakes. They have superior playfields and cabinets and could really pinch Stern if they became a competitor.

4 weeks later
#5072 4 years ago
Quoted from Raegor:

only to a select few that would actually do a swap

Yeah, if I'm honest, a spare playfield I lack both the knowledge or time to swap out would have little value to me. Now someone that has the know how and desire to take on a project like that, maybe, but still...

Bottom line is that these manufacturers should gave stepped up and supplied fully populated playfields for those affected. Minus that, they charged a lot of money for a defective product that will cost most unlucky enough to have received them on resale and that is wrong.

1 year later
#8954 2 years ago

These are pictures from my recently purchase Elvira’s HOH. I noticed what appeared to be some small scratches near the middle of the playfield early on (10-15 plays in). It isnt as noticeable in darker light but yesterday in better light I took some pictures which I’m posting here (this game has about 60-70 plays so far).

Is this normal or a clear coat imperfection? I haven’t purchased many NIB games and not sure if this is me nitpicking or something I should be concerned about long term and report to my distributor and Stern. There appear to be small scratch trails from the middle area which you should be able to see if you enlarge the pictures a bit.

Any insight is appreciated.

3505A6A2-CBF4-4A28-8570-37F0B2E62122 (resized).jpeg3505A6A2-CBF4-4A28-8570-37F0B2E62122 (resized).jpeg3E5B95E1-FD19-406E-9162-545AFD2460C6 (resized).jpeg3E5B95E1-FD19-406E-9162-545AFD2460C6 (resized).jpeg50F60069-58AF-412B-BDD1-9D60CEE6DE73 (resized).jpeg50F60069-58AF-412B-BDD1-9D60CEE6DE73 (resized).jpeg536DB4A4-E73E-44FC-B896-E75E8E4FA0E3 (resized).jpeg536DB4A4-E73E-44FC-B896-E75E8E4FA0E3 (resized).jpeg
#8959 2 years ago
Quoted from cpr9999:

Check your balls....for scratches...

They were the brand new balls that came with the game. Is it definitely a ball issue? Is a bad balk going to do that in 10-15 plays?

#8960 2 years ago

So if it is a ball issue, I did replace them with some other new balls once I noticed. Seems it hasn't been any better. Is this case strictly of bad balls or crappy, unset clearcoat?

#8961 2 years ago

So what balls are you guys ordering these days and arent't going to have problems? Marco?

Promoted items from Pinside Marketplace and Pinside Shops!
$ 32.00
Playfield - Decals
Pinball Mod Co.
 
$ 79.99
Cabinet - Armor And Blades
PinGraffix Pinside Shop
 
Wanted
Machine - Wanted
Richfield, MI
9,000
Machine - For Sale
Carmel Hamlet, NY
$ 19.95
Playfield - Toys/Add-ons
ULEKstore
 
$ 120.00
Cabinet - Shooter Rods
Super Skill Shot Shop
 
From: $ 99.99
Cabinet - Other
Lighted Pinball Mods
 
From: $ 30.00
From: $ 50.00
Cabinet - Armor And Blades
arcade-cabinets.com
 
$ 45.50
Playfield - Toys/Add-ons
The MOD Couple
 
9,600 (OBO)
From: $ 6,999.99
$ 50.00
Playfield - Protection
Duke Pinball
 
$ 24.00
Lighting - Other
Pinball Mod Co.
 
From: $ 129.95
Lighting - Interactive
Hookedonpinball.com
 
12,500
Machine - For Sale
Orlando, FL
$ 120.00
Gameroom - Decorations
Dijohn
 
€ 99.00
Lighting - Under Cabinet
Watssapen shop
 
From: $ 24.00
Playfield - Toys/Add-ons
Twisted Tokens
 
$ 35.00
Cabinet - Decals
Inscribed Solutions
 
From: $ 50.00
Cabinet - Armor And Blades
arcade-cabinets.com
 
$ 80.00
Gameroom - Decorations
Duke Pinball
 
$ 130.00
Gameroom - Decorations
Dijohn
 
From: $ 22.50
Lighting - Led
Lermods
 
$ 18.95
Playfield - Toys/Add-ons
ULEKstore
 

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider utesichiban.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/continued-playfield-issues-with-jjp-and-stern?tu=utesichiban and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.