Quoted from Frax:Guess you both are going to not be buying from a lot of companies from now on, now that you've discovered that this happens....about 13 years after everyone else already knew it was going on.
It always fascinates me how people react to stuff like this. When there's actual violations of privacy and legal matters, it's like yeah whatever no problem, but the second someone tries to benefit off someone else's mistake, OH IT'S ON I'M NEVER BUYING FROM THEM NOW! lol... Any of you guys buy Invisiglass over PDI and see *any* distinction between that and Cointaker/PBB? Just curious.
*Edit* Maybe I should start a business philosophy/ethics thread instead of hijacking this one lol..
Sorry, but this post makes no sense.
Why would you assume that just because people here are less likely to buy from PBB because of their business practice of buying a competitors similar domain that these people have no problem with "actual violations of privacy and legal matters". That's a complete non-sequitur.
Also, why do you assume that people who feel this way just "now" discovered that this happens?
The fact that it happens is relevant how? Does it make it ok from an ethical business standpoint? Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's ethical.
And what the hell does PDI and Invisiglass have to do with *anything* here? Have one of those companies bought a domain with the other's business name in it?
I don't think you made a single valid point in your post.
Quoted from TomGWI:Did JJP steal pinball decals website domain?
Exactly!
