Quoted from PinballHelp:PinWiki has a number of issues:
1. It's a Wiki... it has no real "verification" or editing process - anyone can edit a page and change some information that could cause a person's machine to be worse off than before. There are no checks-and-balances.
2. PinWiki is not any more stable or secure than Clay's guides. The site has no clear policy regarding copyright - there is nothing saying the content is put into the public domain - it's clearly owned by somebody (or a bunch of people)
3. When you click on the "about us" at Pinwiki here's what you see:
"PinWiki was created for the purpose of holding all things pinball in one location. There is a lot of information available on the Internet for pinball but its scattered everywhere. The goal is to incorporate the many groups of information into one centralized location that can be contributed to by all.
PinWiki was launched on April 21, 2011 at 9pm officially, kicking off with a wiki and a forum. All information contained in this wiki was added from that date on. "
The owner(s) of Pinwiki as far as I know are secret, and insist on keeping under the radar, and there's no guarantee the site could go pay or disappear from the Internet at any time.
Some areas of PinWiki are pretty cool - and I can see some potential, but there is no clear overseer taking responsibility for the legitimacy of the content, and the content is not public domain, so the site is as much a ticking time bomb as Clay's guides. There have been discussions about this over and over.. if the site is really intended on being a true public resource, it should require all content submitted to have clear public domain or CC licensing terms like standard Wikipedia.
Jesus Christ man...let it go. You've made your point over and over. We get it. We (Wiki authors) don't agree.
There are a couple of us who regularly "patrol" the Wiki for content validity when new content is added. Some of the older Wiki content still needs to be cleaned up as it was authored before we established a "standard format". If beefing up a particular section of the Wiki could help folks, let me know. I'll prioritize that section higher. Right now, content is added as the main authors come across new info and take new pictures.
Clay's "guide" wasn't compiled overnight. It takes time to document information in a quality way.
This pining for Clay's guides comes up about once a year, along with "Steve Young is a <whatever>", and the RGP vs PinSide "conversation".
I'd rather see people establish a Wiki account and use their energy to add good content.
Cheerfully submitted...
--
Chris Hibler - CARGPB #31
http://www.Team-EM.com
http://webpages.charter.net/chibler/Pinball/index.htm
http://www.PinWiki.com - The Place to go for Pinball Repair Info