Hi mrbanjo
thanks for answer, description and pictures. The picture in post-6 shows the socket for testing the standard relays. I see two sockets for connecting the coil. I see 4 times 3 sockets (4 rows top -> down). I believe each such relay has four 3-bladed-Make-and-Brake-Switches. The wires to these 12 sockets determine how the M+B-Switches are used - 2 blades may be used for a neeeded (pin-logic) Normally-Open-Switch.
I refer to the ipdb-manual "Juke-Box" -> page-20 (ori-18) -> A-Relay and 3000-Relay and Photocell-Relay and Change-Relay have "Capacitor AND Diode ? and Resistor ?" - these Relays are different to the others.
B-, C-, D-, E, F-, Extra-, Special-Relay: To me they look identical - SWAPPABLE. I would mark (on the capsule / housing) EACH of these relays - so I always know, example: THIS IS Original-B-Relay.
Extra-Relay works fine - B-Relay does not establish "Self-Hold-Circuitry, B-Relay buzzes". I would swap B-Relay and Extra-Relay and test functionalty.
I predict: Extra-Relay in "Original-Place of B-Relay" will NOT establish Self-Hold-Circuitry (no pulling forever). Question: Does Extra-Relay in "Original-Place of B-Relay" BUZZ ?
I predict: B-Relay in "Original-Place of Extra-Relay" WILL establish Self-Hold-Circuitry (PULLING forever). Question: Does B-Relay in "Original-Place of Extra-Relay" BUZZ ?
On a given place (example: B-Relay) there are 3 chances of "fault": 1) the encapsulated Relay itself is faulty, 2) the condenser (?) is shot, 3) the wiring to the socket is no good.
With test (above) You can answer the question: "Is B-Relay itself faulty" ? (((Extra-Relay in place of B-Relay give different behaviour of the playfield-functionality))) "is B-Relay itself good" (((Extra-Relay in place of B-Relay give same behaviour of the playfield-functionality)))
For now I would put-off the question (is it good ?) "Condenser" - that would meen: Unsoldering -> swapping places -> solder-on again of swapped "Condenser on B-Relay" "Condenser on Extra-Relay" ...
For now I would sneak-in into the pin a (well defined) fault -> the behaviour (after sneaking-in) of the pin tells us about the "buzzing problem".
At schema-A/B/C-21/22/23/24 are drawn "A,B,C,D,E,F"-Relays, also Special-Relay and Extra-Relay. At schema-C-20 is the "Normally-Closed-Switch on Outhole-Relay" - wire-color-green and wire-color-grey-blue are soldered-on.
Sneak-in a stripe of paper into this switch -> make it OPEN. Then do "test-original-layout" (B-Relay on original place, Extra-Relay on original place) -> the "Extra-Relay" will not establish "Self-Hold-Circuitry (because of sneaked-in stripe of paper in Outhole-Relay-Switch) - but the question is: When You do manipulate (as Your are used on the "faulty A- through F-Relays") -> question: Does NOW the Extra-Relay also buzz ? Means: "Is there a difference in "feeding through closed self-Hold-Circuitry" feeding through manipulated playfield switch" " ? Must we look in detail the wiring of wire-color-grey-blue ? - Have ALL these socket a wire-color-grey-blue soldered-on ?
Depending on the results of Your tests: "Swapping condensers" and do similar testing (about the same tests as written above) ? Start a new topic in pinside "How to test an condenser ?" Greetings Rolf