I have several people emailing me asking "what's up with Ron's trashing of CPR playfields?" and directing me to this thread. I got here and my eyes nearly popped out of my head with this claim (above). Wow. Ron? Are you OK ?
First off, I'm never on here much, so I'm going to take this opportunity to toot our horn a little bit.
- No, the VAST majority are DEAD-ON. Like 90-95%+ That's the whole point. Next year will be 10 years at doing this.
- CPR playfields are the best repro playfields, period.
- Repro playfields aren't going to get any better than this.
- Even factory cannot surpass the small-scale "boutique" attitude and run quality we're at. Churchill included.
I am currently surrounded (on my home office walls) with one of every playfield we have done. Not cherry picked. Just a random grab/keeper from every run. I can walk up to any one of them and they are all dead-on for alignment, registration, and yes even the clearcoats are high par. I (personally) wouldn't see a need to touch any of them. And if I did, I'd get a $150 3M kit (as shown on our site) and bring these babies up to flat glass at about $3 per playfield. (because the complete 3M Perfect-It kit gives you enough materials to do 50 playfields).
The pictures I am looking at grind my gears when they don't include the necessary backstories. Putting them out there as examples/paradigms are just not fair. Nor honest.
CENTAUR - for starters, what I am seeing is a red-misaligned second. That playfield would have been sold for a discount, and caveated up front (usually with pictures to the buyer) of the red areas outside their black lines. I need to know who bought it, or where it's origin was. Somebody please step up and tell the story.
So yes, that Centaur is off (red layer only), but the full-priced paradigms were not. We always have a few misaligned playfields in every run (unavoidable) as we tweak the wet press into registration over the *first 5-7 boards* of every print run. You need that many hits to get the crosshairs dead-on. Once you're dead-on, you lock the press and proceed. Every playfield after that is crosshair-locked, and the color going down is dead-on registered with the ones previously put down. You HAVE to do this, in order for the blackline to sit on top at the end. You're building a stack of colors where you can't go back when you're laying the black over top at the very end. You have to get your stack correct.
FATHOM - Those rollover circles are NOT off. The art package was placed exactly where it was supposed to be on the face of those woods. Remember, we have IPB's (Gene's) original Bally films. EXACT artwork as on everybody's playfields in their games. Not a redraw. So those rollover outlines are exactly where Bally had them. Their line weight is exactly as intended. Our cut of the woods is exact as an original (within a 1000th of an inch, by micrometer) as we always cut-and-recut 7-8 tests on MDF (with tweaks per pass) clamping the repro cut to the original playfield and looking/feeling through all the holes. The final "official" cut is so good, you can hold the clamped original/repro up to the light and look/feel through every hole and they line up perfectly. I've added an IPDB photo of the Fathom upper playfield area below. Everybody's rollover rings are not centered on the insert. It's in my opinion to try to paint/touchup those rings to make them somehow not show wood around the insert edges...would be frigging with a major esthetic of the playfield look. Unnecessary.
Had the Fathom (or Centaur - also IPB films) artwork been digital redraws in vector, I would personally tweak/relocate/center insert rings on inserts to MY liking. Which I do on all our playfields where the artwork is native CPR. I have that freedom. On Fathom and Centaur I do not. I've included a photo of the S&S repro bowling pins rollovers to prove what CPR DEAD-ON looks like. It's because I controlled where the openings in the white ink were, and I centered them in the artwork to physically dead center on the rollovers.
Quoted from kruzman: How much is someone suppose to spend on top of the price of the pf? it gets expensive.
I say spend nothing. It's in my opinion that nothing (zero) is required for our playfields, out of the box. Swap them and go. And if one wants to wait for 4-6 months for the clearcoat to shrink down and do it's slight vertical ripple texture (which ALL do, and ALL will - regardless of repro maker, Churchill, Stern, WOZ, etc) then they can perform the 3M Perfect-It process as outlined in detail on our site. Besides, even somebody going the third-party clear route - after 6 months THAT clear job equally goes vertical-rippled after the clear shrinks. You can't really win. Not unless you want to work on the clearcoat 6-10 months after it has completely, and I mean completely, settled and stopped shrinking/moving. All automotive clearcoats look flat and like perfect glass in their first month or two.
Now of course, people do come in at the end (or at shows) and take the seconds/leftovers/discounted playfields. They spend less, but want to bring them up to higher standards with touchups and re-clear. That's precisely where you (Ron) come in. So they have some wiggle room in their budget, if they are that determined to make those discount-playfield flaws go away.
Even you know this Ron. You have frequently taken end-of-the-line lower-par playfields at deep discounts, welcoming their flaws, for planning to spruce them up with the Ron Kruzman magic (I have the emails!). I thought it was a great idea. I went back through PayPal, and noticed you rarely got a full-priced playfield shipment (Gold) because on several of the preorder lists the last few years, you hadn't hopped in before the preorders closed. Maybe you're so used to buying/seeing/working on CPR seconds that you think that's what everybody is getting. As if that's what we're making up here.
Quoted from kruzman:There was plenty of work done making flasws disappear. They don't line up the screens, and it shows worst on the inserts. I am finishing a fathom today, and guess what was the biggest problem? it wasn't the clear, but the color screens wer'nt lined up and it shows around the inserts.
The art package is laid dead-on where it is supposed to be on the wood.
To move those rollover rings centered on the rollovers would mean shifting the entire art package right/up and would misalign the whole artwork to the rest of the upper (and lower) playfield features.
Five slightly-hokey keylines around five rollovers are 100 times less important than the actual artwork sitting in it's correct spot on the playfield. Especially when the hokey keylines are as Bally had them! I have the original blackline film to prove it. Every Fathom out there proves it.
No.... No, you don't.
I disagree. The keylines are exactly as intended. But I am interested in seeing your "after" pictures to see the alleged better alternative. I want to see what "corrected Bally" looks like.
PS: all our rollovers (for the last 4 years or more) are plugged with the factory rollover plugs (like you use) and get ZERO clearcoat inside them. They are lifted out just after the each coat shoot. Until the last coat (after 4 coats with zero). On that last coat they may get a slight "dew" or mist... but it's tons better than when they used to get 5 coats with the rollovers wide open to get mist.
You do great work. No question. One of the last in the hobby at this tier. But as much as you've been a great loyal customer to date, these offshoots of strange blanket critique do blindside us from time to time.
KEVIN
Classic Playfield Reproductions
http://www.classicplayfields.com
fathom-upper.jpg
strikesplaf14.jpg