Quoted from Who-Dey:N I’m not trying to argue anything at all, I’m just saying that I personally do not “need” the internet. I do however believe in capitalism though and I think it’s ok for say these cable companies to be allowed to protect their investment. If the government however did subsidize the infrastructure as you claim, then I can see where they would have some say in the matter.
Capitalism is mostly fine, but the consumer also has the right to know what they are buying in this system of government. In your scenario of protecting investment, if a cable company is going to slow down service for a competing product such as Netflix then the customer should be informed before they sign up and pay for said service. Otherwise it is a bait and switch. Without Net Neutrality it would be so wide ranging which products could get affected by the service provider that it would be almost impossible for a customer to stay informed about the features that affect them. Also, when there are limited choices in providers such as in utilities some regulation is needed to keep the customer from getting bilked. Power utilities are regulated including prices for this reason. They make a profit and their stocks are usually decent/boring dividend plays but the profit is kept under control for sake of doing business in a necessary monopoly or near monopoly. The government allows steady profit with reasonable controls/regulation.