Quoted from vdojaq:Actually, it wasn't. That was Ruth's reply with the OP's demand to void the contract and send him a refund. It's there for all to read.
actually no its not. He has purposefully tried not to post the email he sent on aug 16th at midnight. He has posted the one from the 17th he sent referring to the other one but hasnt posted the first one.
You never know what could have been in that other email as he was pissed and could have made some bad statements.
Now im not on either side here but he posts emails and deliberately leaves out important pieces of the conversation and when asked to post that, he posts the same thing again purposefully not showing the email in question.
Im not backing FUN here at all, they have def done some questionable practices here.
Would just like to see the email from aug 16th that he references to on august 17th, because to me it seems Ruth might be responding to the earlier email.