Quoted from Grandnational007:Ever seen the other side of a Medusa playfield? The space shuttle's engineering is seemingly LESS complex with how they packaged and fit everything in that space. It's mind blowing. There has to be about 12 miles of wire, the drop banks, all the lighting, the zipper flipper mechs, the pops, the spinners, all those coils, etc. etc. From the topside, it doesn't LOOK that complex.
Again, making an exact replica of a classic game would cost a fortune today.
As much crap as people talk, node boards, surface mount technology, and coms cables are probably the very things that have significantly decreased the BOM for Stern, and allowed them to stay profitable without larger price increases than we're already used to.
Nobody is making an exact replica. As you say, there are cost saving measures with modern tech, and if that is compatible with the requirements, that is what will be used.
Many classic SS titles are for sure cost effective to remake when you get into the 7+k mark that you would be into for a pristine example, and the margin will improve with volume.
Quoted from Haymaker:I think you are confusing "less complex" with "me no see ramps n stuff this game cheap" I guarantee the BOM on many classic ballys is higher than most modern pins.
IDK, having trouble seeing this.. I understand the B+W titles are still crazy for BOM, but most classics are not that crazy when you break it down.