(Topic ID: 298843)

Back in MY day, you had to work for a multiball

By Doctor6

2 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 124 posts
  • 75 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 2 years ago by punkin
  • Topic is favorited by 1 Pinsider

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    ct4 (resized).jpg
    425b69c18b59586293e5d5b2766e5e4d3146ddd3 (resized).jpg
    7C3B50B4-808E-494D-B226-D482CB21E5A3 (resized).jpeg
    release odin (resized).PNG
    9777616F-3C2B-40EF-90E8-BD24F1ACF753.gif

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider hoakypoaky.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #93 2 years ago

    Taxi's multiball is so well designed, because it's the only multiball that I can think of where you get 2 balls on the playfield & haven't "technically" started mutiball yet.

    That requires you to re-lock both balls in the saucers within a short amount of time (music increasing in intensity as you fail away), get your little lightshow & song-and-dance for accomplishing that, then both balls are ejected for you to HAMMER the ramps for 300K point jackpots. Hard work for big rewards. That's a well coded game.

    Easy & constant mutiballs are the absolute worst thing about modern coding on some titles. If it's too easy it's to achieve, it's not appealing at all to me.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider hoakypoaky.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/back-in-my-day-you-had-to-work-for-a-multiball?tu=hoakypoaky and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.