Quoted from ChrisS:How many companies actually promised to build machines and haven't delivered and have actually folded? I believe 3 now?
Are the machines being deliveried slowly? Yes. Are there issues. Yes. But are there MMr's out there. Yes.
Wholly? Predator? JPop?
First point worth noting it that WOOLY never folded. They did EXACTLY as they promised. They opened upt he idea of making their game IF they could get 100 people committed by a specific date. When they did not get 100 people committed they did EXACTLY what they said and gave everyone back 100% of the deposit! They never folded. They never flaked. They never took money and did not deliver or hold that money for years with interest.
Quoted from ChrisS:I'm just glad someone is actually making parts at this point. 5-7+ years ago there was little to no chance of specific parts being made for a lot of machines. Now someone has found a way to make a business out of it. Good for them. If you get your hopes up before you see the release of a product your just silly.
Unfortunately in the past 2 years, part production has gone down and not up. The real problem I have with the currnet PPS model is the lies and promises to deliver on a multitude of products that never come around. How many times have they abused the community for market research, NOS parts on 'loan', and promises of new parts coming and then ZILCH? They are using social games to try and undermine the hobby as a whole.
Quoted from ChrisS:It's a business. There are people and salaries that have to be paid. If not the business folds and then your back to square 1.
Actually square 1 would be better. License holders that are actually making products themselves and have a vested interest in how customers are treated and products getting done in a reasonable amount of time. Right now the entire business model is built on selling license rights for other to remake stuff but then no concern with real quality or it customers just get scammed (WH2O topper anyone?; some of the poor quality backglasses in the past year). Square 1 would mean the actual possibility that someone will come in and build more quality parts.
Quoted from ChrisS:Also you must have accidentally omitted the MMr in your wish list or collection because you have a lot of negative things to say about a machine you don't have any involvement in concerning the process of purchasing or waiting on.
My concern is for the hobby as a whole. I dont need to be in on or own a MMr to understand than a vaccuum of this amount of $ out of the hobby is overall just a cash grab and an overall negative. I would rather see people buy uncoded but new games from Stern as they are reinvesting in pinball for the long term. PPS has this whole vocal stance that "NO GAME IS SAFE and WE WILL REMAKE THEM ALL" just because he wants to undermine the seconday market values and volume of sales on all 'possible' remake games. He wants that instability and wants the money going to him/his business only it appears. Sure it is good business, but all at teh cost of the hobby in the long term.
A healthy secondary market is a big part of the resurgance of our hobby the past 10 years.
Quoted from ChrisS:Are you actually telling me that every pin you have purchased you sell for what you purchased it for or you take a lose? I find that hard to believe. I think we all figure out the cost of the pin, blood sweat and tears labor, and parts we put into the machines and then add a couple bucks so we can purchase the next one. So would I be a sad man because I chose to make a couple bucks?
I am not a business and I bring value when I refurb a game. The FEW games I have actually sold, some I have made money on and others I have lost (I think of it more of got my money out since there is value in playing/ owning the game even if I sell it for less), but that is really apples and oranges to PPS. If it is the same to you, then to me the largest difference is all my money goes straight back into supporting/promoting the hobby.