Quoted from dzoomer:Manic has been grinding his axe against MMR vociferously and for what seems like forever. I hope if some PPS/CGC faded inserts are such a disaster that he is equally dismissive of Stern issues, lest he be a hypocrite, such as
-shipping out mis-spelled playfields (even for replacements, lol),
-a laundry list of pf fixes in two of the most recent Stern releases (GB and BM66),
-xfassa's GB pf chipping after 20 plays and being denied replacement, not "defective" as you describe it,
-and the many other owners with chipped recent new Stern pf's who are not "qualifying" for the program, or as you describe it again, not "defective", and
-ridiculously early code and ridiculously late code.
Anyone seen him railing against Stern?
Fortunately for me TWD Prem has been perfect out of the box so no need for me to be "vociferous" about it (good word btw).
With the sky high prices of these things I figure this would be the last one for me anyways. I got lucky as I've always stated that it's a gamble when you open the Stern box. In several posts actually...and this was *before* the GB PF mess. I think TWD was the last Stern title that *didn't* have a boatload of issues to contend with.
I remember being apprehensive opening that box... not exactly the NIB experience you hope for.
Back in the day Stern DID send me an unpopulated PF for TSPP as mine was the last run and the silkscreen was giving out and leaving splotches on the PF. So they did do that... didn't charge me a penny for it either. So there's that anyways.
Thank god I didn't have a hard on for the GB theme. If I had gotten bit by a bad one EVERYBODY would have me on ignore by now Others did get vociferous (gotta use that word now) about it though and good for them for holding their feet to the flame.
Yeah I wouldn't risk a Stern right now myself but they are apparently sending out full PF swaps for their customers. Not even charging them $200 either. Personally I wouldn't want the hassle or anxiety going through this anyway after spending all that money.
I'd like them ALL to up their game and send out a quality product or at least fully stand behind it. I don't want to have to rely on the "benevolence" of a company to make me happy. I'd hate to hear what so many heard when they called about their faded PF... "falls within specs". Now *that* is something no unhappy customer wants to hear.
You have a good point but I don't think the whole "this company may be bad but this other one is worse" really inspires much confidence for the new buyer.