ok, wacko here at it again. same old story..can't decide what to buy. sold star wars, not sure what to buy..can't make a decision. advice is always appreciated. metallica-could get it (one of the last ones out there new in box), like it, afraid i won't like the music in home setting. i did not love most music on iron maiden. attack from mars-too shallow? or go with Jurassic park? which seems like its the most popular game these days.
If you don’t like Metallica’s music than go with AFM. I have both and I am a metal/Metallica fan so I like both games equally. That’s why I own both. Can’t go wrong with JP or Iron Maiden either so really it comes down to what theme you like best. AFM never gets old tho and I’m so glad I have that game. The call outs, the rules/shots, and the multiballs are all some of the best in pinball.
Having played a whole lot of all three, owned a Met Pro and now own a JP Premium and play AFM at league and at my buddy's houses (original and remake)...I would definitely recommend a JP Premium. While AFM is a classic no doubt, I agree with others that it can get old compared to something like JP where there is much deeper code and more shots. JP is a lot more challenging as well which I think is a great characteristic for a home collection game. I tended to favor the 90s bally/Williams games but have started to appreciate the depth of some of the newer machines and believe that JP, especially the premium vs the pro, is a masterpiece.
Gosh this is a tough one. You already have an amazing collection of games. I kinda think you should stay away from MET if you think the music will bother you.
Now you are at a similar delima that I am of you exclude MET. I love Jurassic Park but I'm a little afraid of Sterns quality at the moment and that's the only reason I dont already own a JP. That leaves me with AFMR and MBR.
I played a AFMR the other day and i gotta say that it is really really really good. I think i enjoyed as much as JP honestly but its obviously not going to be as deep with rules as JP is.
If it was me and taking everything into consideration I would go with AFMR and if you get a classic be sure to get the color dmd upgrade chip for 400 bucks. That puts you at 6400, if you can afford another 1K get the SE model with the bigger display, upgraded toys, and upgraded sound package.
You can always get a JP at a later date because it will be made at least two more years. If you're a rules nerd then get a JP. If you arent then get the AFMR. You are a winner regardless of which game that you choose.
Is JP premium that much better? I played both and don't think the dino head and raptor cage add that much more to gameplay over the pro.
I don't think you go wrong with either. AFM is one of the best if not best classics from 90's. MET is one of the best if not best Stern dmd game. JP is the best Spike game. I think JP is the best overall but that's probably because it's the newest.
Quoted from jawjaw:Is JP premium that much better? I played both and don't think the dino head and raptor cage add that much more to gameplay over the pro.
I don't think you go wrong with either. AFM is one of the best if not best classics from 90's. MET is one of the best if not best Stern dmd game. JP is the best Spike game. I think JP is the best overall but that's probably because it's the newest.
JP is so packed for a Pro. I think its Stern's best pro to date. I keep wondering if the premium is worth the extra over the pro.
My vote is JP. Code is great, shots are stellar....and they will keep continuing to polish code. However, I agree with Who-dey in regards to quality. Im skeptical of NIB with Stern right now.
thanks for the info from everyone i've played the JP premium in Pittsburgh. it is better for sure. on this go around though, i will get a pro or classic edition.
it is me on JP, but it seems like puzzle solving and slower? maybe I have not played that far or watched enough videos on it, but it seems like there isn't this crazy dinosaur stuff like chases, shooting dinos or things like that. when I see it its the control room, rescuing people, etc. I"m not saying its a bad game, but it seems slower and more strategy vs some frantic game.
Quoted from Vino:SW has both qualities but sounds like you sold it. JP would compliment your existing collection but AFM/MET are faster games.
Chose MET but no bad decision here.
yup. i sold sw. i lost interest in it i guess
Quoted from zaki:thanks for the help. went with afm. my heart was in it for that. almost got Metallica.
Good choice! We want to see some pics when you get it all set up!
Quoted from Krupps4:ATM is a classic that will always stand the test of time. Just my two cents.
Absolutely. A classic!
Wait ... what's ATM again?
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/atm-vs-met-vs-jp?hl=zaki and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
Aurora, OH
Trollhättan