Quoted from attack7777:I'm just fine and I very much appreciate your concern. And I agree, in the right time and in the right place, a well-timed pejorative expression can be really funny. To me, though, this just isn't one of those places. I'm not sitting here with outrage and fire coming out of my ears, but I think some things are better left in the past, especially in a pinball game, where it just isn't the same as a great comedian's set.
Waaaay not related to the game, but I'd be curious your thoughts on something media related. I finally got to catch episode 3 of "The Last of Us" last night, and the presentation of Frank's character was so stereotypically absurd that it might as well have been as seriously taken as a "Will and Grace" episode.
Druckman is not meaning offense, but I'd have to assume many with good taste would feel the portrayal of Frank was about as deconstructive and misguided as to Druckman's assumed intentions moreso than helpful. Present a homosexual relationship as something entirely empathetic to people otherwise maybe not so open to such a concept.
Offerman's performance, and to a lesser extent the writing of his character, was absolutely fantastic, ironically given how ludicrously presented Frank was shown to be.
My point being, assumed intentions or not, harm can still exist via a creator's vision.