"Tried" being the key word.
Quoted from Plungemaster:I do undestand your point, but 8k for a toy is way beyond normal. There is not 1 argument that makes this sain.
Ever bought a boat? Jet ski? Deluxe Pool Table? ATV? I suppose you could call all those toys in'sain,' but others could make the point that they feel the entertainment value surrounding those items and the joy it brings to their friends, family, and the memories make the purchases, in the end, fairly 'sain.'
If the product doesn't justify the price to you, cool, don't buy. Obviously if you buy kayaks and use them twice, hang em up where they collect webs for the next three years, then they aren't worth as much to you as a someone who kayaks every morning for three miles before breakfast. You probably don't want to spend as much on your kayaks as the guy who uses it every day.
You keep saying you disagree with this point, but don't really offer up any reasoning.
Quoted from Plungemaster:But that is not the discussion here. The discussion is, or should be: do you think 8k for pins is a healthy situation for pinball in generic?
Well, it might not be. But wait and see? How much time have you put on a WOZ? How far into the future can you see? The system has so much potential that I'm not sure it'll be fully realized this time next year. Why were $4800 pins which could've been plucked from 1992, with next to no innovation and often worse art, which in no way gave the average person any extra incentive to play pinball over a twenty year period, why were those machines any better for pinball than an $8000 next generation machine with new features designed to enthrall the general public, offering a complex and engaging ruleset for a deep players' game which will not grow old (hopefully) for many years?
Like I said, evaluate the specific product without drawing conclusions based on a generalization founded in an imaginary cost ceiling.