Quoted from rosh:I get what you are saying, given how bad the resets were, I would think it would still be an issue. Considering I could still make it reset without the DMD and dmd board powered. Considering what you are saying and since it is not indicating that resets would be occurring, it would certainly suggest that there is limited value in the more advanced version of the product in many, if not most cases.
Regardless, the basic board certainly gets the job done.
Well, the key thing is exactly what the board does: It moves the MPU's 5V supply off of the original linear 5V regulator. It does it with a switching regulator on a different power source. Two beneficial contributions.
The Driver board and its associated components are the source of the resets but it is the limited window of the power monitoring circuit on the MPU board that actually does the resetting (of the CPU). The switching regulator is much more tolerant of lower input voltages (regardless of their source). So, in its simple beauty, the board provides a differently created 5 volts to the CPU that is not likely to drop low enough to trigger a reset.
The original 5V regulator is still powering the associated ICs on the driver board but they can typically continue to perform at voltages lower than the reset set point of the power monitor on the MPU board. And, even if they did have a bit of a hick-up with a drop in 5V, the software in continuously resending new data to the driver board which would more than likely instantly correct the data corruption.
It is issues with the Sound Board, DMD controller or Audio Visual board that would be more prone to showing fault as the original regulated 5V continues to deteriorate.
Agreed. It would appear there is little value to the fault indicator version of the board. But hey! Some people just like to see an LED on the boards they invest in!!!!