You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider excalabur.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Can I ask why the classics finals are 1+4+top two from (i), rather than, say, 1+4+winner (i)+2nd place (ii), just to vary the groups? Yes, this might hold up one of the semifinal groups, but it reduces the amount that players are stuck together.
Quoted from sk8ball:Hope you mean 100. 1000 would make everything else not worth doing. Also if you have to resort to making up custom scoring for a machine for a major tournament you probably should not be using it. JMO of course.
From the PAPA rules, Rule X.1.c:
c. On the game NBA Fastbreak using basketball-style scoring, each championship ring collected by the player shall cause their recorded score to be increased by 1000 points.
So it's not like INDISC is making up things of their own accord. Presumably PAPA hasn't used NBA FB in the A bank in a few years 
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider excalabur.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/announce-3rd-annual-it-never-drains-in-so-california-pinball-classic?tu=excalabur and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
Southampton