You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider crazylevi.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Well, let's use your state for example.
Jeez dude you got some work to do!
Light humor aside, there's no need to change anything. I haven't heard anybody clamoring for this, and the majority of players who will actually qualify for this will prefer the flexibility they currently have.
It's also the first year of the new system (the fruits of the dreaded $1 fee that was going to destroy the IFPA) so I think a wait and see approach is prudent before suggesting drastic changes.
WI (resized).jpgQuoted from Whysnow:you are correct. Congrats on qualifying for NY so far. You still have zero flex... It is either NY or nothing for you.
So what?
I'm not talking about myself.
PLenty of players will have a number of options. For some reason that you can't explain to my satisfaction you think they shouldn't, when exactly NOBODY except yourself has ever suggested the current system doesn't work.
I'm not suggesting your opinion doesn't carry much weight because you are so poorly ranked in your own state. Everybody is entitled to an opinion.
If you really want to get players' opinions on this, you should throw it out on tiltforums. Those guys are aching for something to discuss.
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider crazylevi.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/an-idea-to-improve-the-ifpa-nacs?tu=crazylevi and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
New York, NY