I take back what I said about believing the interview to be a waste of time and that it would be soft.
The questions were more adversarial than I expected them to be, and I think the interview was a worthwhile contribution. Good job Pinball News.
I have to say also that with the exception of the early replies, Andrew's answers were a lot less inflammatory than I was expecting them to be. There's a lot of conspiracy theory stuff, and contradictions of other people's stories, but there always is.
I am one of the few people it seems who are very suspicious of the new investors (I keep thinking of that "green trim LE could be yours!" email that went out very recently), so some of what AH said resonated with me. That said, a lot of it could be said to have been "fed" by what others have said on here (eg suggestion of asset stripping, which will come out in the wash in time). A few of the questions were answered in a way that suggested that Andrew simply consolidated a lot of posters suspicions on this thread, perhaps to gain credulity and sympathy, or simply because they are true. Who knows for sure.
The simple takeaway for me, having very little personal experience in this debacle, is that it's a crying shame how it all panned out.