BS there are way to many new crap games in the list

Agreed. Every turd that comes out seemingly automatically makes its way into the top 50

Not a bad idea to reevaluate, my old ratings aren't really all that acurate after playing a wider variety of games

So new to the game, mentioning the same old shit, and stirring up trouble eh?

Oh never mind, that sounds like a lifetime member

But honestly, just get over it.

Older games that are in the top have passed the test of time instead of just being the newest game that people are excited about.

Disagree. The list is generally pretty decent IMO. Not a bible, but a guide.

You people get so bent around the axle over that rating system. I am more interested in people's comments than the rating itself. Caucasion2step's reviews are some of the best in that regard.

Just click on "various" and then sort by decade. The problem with the current system is that its biased in favor of dmd era games. Why is a turd like Junkyard rated above classics like Centaur, Pinbot, Space Shuttle, and High Speed? That would be like if they made a list of the top 100 quarterbacks and put Jay Cutler above Joe Montana. They should probably just make the top 100 dmd only and then have a top 100 non DMD solid-state.

I do wish they could redo the rankings as its the only way I know which games to buy.

logic again.......how the hell did I end up w a tronle instead of a SS? must be an idiot, I guess.....

I glance over there every now and then, but it's actually pretty predictable.......some titles (TZ, MM) just deserve it because not only stand the test of time, but are actually still fun to play.....most of the newer ones are either 1's or 10's.....I try to vote "11" for all my games, but can't seem to break the code yet.....

The em top 100 is all over the place, and we haven't seen anything new since the late 1970's.