Quoted from Thunderbird:(Just look up yourself his past posts then PM me with an apology, it’s all there, saying he too would like some additional code.)
I'm not going to waste my time.
Quoted from Thunderbird:Seems your pretty easy to please my friend Cotton. You’re the only person I’ve seen saying we don’t need more code, but then again, your also one of the few that doesn’t like grandpa’s basement either. Lol
The first 3 coins I dropped into Munsters was love at the end of Ball 1. I actually got to play for a little bit before the drain came. For this trip to the arcade, Munsters got the rest of my money. Fast and loose. Fair shots. At TPF in Dallas, I got to spend more time on Munsters on free play. On the way home, I stopped at the arcade again and Munsters got all my money. With in days I was shopping for one and found the LE I bought.
I never knew there was a problem until I stumbled onto the "worst code ever" thread.
I never said I did not like Grandpa's Basement. Don't be putting words in my mouth, please.
What I said was that I liked it with Grandpa's Lab turned off as the flow was a little different and a little faster. I also told people who own a Pro, or who were reluctant to buy a Pro that The Pro was no slouch of a pin. The Pro, on its own, needs no apology.
I am happy with the pin as it is. I am a happy customer. Is that criminal? The unhappy early adopters have sold out to others, who apparently are happy with their purchase. I do not recall reading any 2nd hand buyers waltz in and carp about the code. Maybe I have been the only one saying Munsters is fine as it is; But I'm willing to bet that I am not the only one who feels that it is fine as it is.
I recall several posts you have made about how Stern needs to do this or do that with the code---because it will help their sales. That's a bold statement to make when you have no inking of an idea of what Stern's sales objectives are/were. And then you come in talking how you talked with John Borg and yada yada and sales have been good.
Quoted from Thunderbird:I spoke directly with John and he said that sales of Munsters was doing extremely well and better than they anticipated.
My question to you is: If sales are good and Dwight/Stern say Munsters is complete, then what motivation would Stern have to go back in a mess with something that is selling good? It is not like Stern is selling a piece of junk.
Quoted from Thunderbird:I would expect, that when we do finally get some proper Munsters polish, needed code enhancements and additional code to make it more worthy to stay in HUO environment, you won’t be downloading it to your machine, right? (How much is Stern/Dwight paying you to say we don’t need any further updates other than the paltry 2 we’ve received?) Lol (Unreal)
I have not bothered to look into all that secret handshake stuff about if you press this flipper button so many times followed by pressing the other flipper so many times and back and forth. And while I would/will probably install any new code updates, it would be a long time after all of the early adopters have installed any new code.
Quoted from Thunderbird:Now compare that with the love my TMNT machine has received: Munsters code basically stopped at 1.0 (.03 was only for the topper). TMNT just received another meaningful update to 1.23, with hints of more to come. Hmmm, paid the same price for both machines. From what you say here Cotton, you would have only downloaded TMNT 1.0 code and then stopped? Because that is what came in the box? Lol
I have had an opportunity to play TMNT. It's OK. It is a little more difficult to learn, I suppose. The only thing I have to say about TMNT is that I have no desire to buy one and if I were to buy one if would have to be cheap enough that I would be able to get ALL my money when I sold it. I wouldn't bother to drive across town to pick up a TMNT unless it was dirt cheap, whereas I drove a 2000 mile/ 3200 km round trip to get my LE.
Great. Who-Dey said it could use a little more code. I don't see him waving torches and pitchforks at Stern about "we need more code".
The man is not even in the ground yet and it seems like you want to proselytize his name to use to push an agenda that I don't think Who-Dey cared all that much about. And I take exception to that.
I mean, what do you want to do? Send Stern an email saying, " We lost one of our pinball brothers who really loved his Munsters, but he thought is needs more code. So will you, Stern, honor his wish and shoot out some more code in honor of Who-Dey so those of us still around can get new code for our Munsters?"
Quoted from Jnyvio:My condolences R.I.P. Who-Dey. Lets push for new Munsters code on his behalf.. Who's with me..
===============================================================
I also agree with Chuck Wert. It is poor form to be publicly outing Stern employees email addresses so everyone can pile on and flood their email boxes with emails begging for more code for a machine that you admitted that sales are good.
Quoted from Thunderbird:I spoke directly with John and he said that sales of Munsters was doing extremely well and better than they anticipated.
If you don't like the pin then sell it. You should not have any trouble. There are currently 5 Pros and one Premium for sale on Pinside. Of the 6, 3 are are "sale pending". You should not have any trouble unloading.
====================================================================
EDIT: I should add that 4-5 years ago when I was starting out, I stopped at Cactus Jacks in Oklahoma City. Two of the pins I tried out were Ghostbusters and TWD. I did not like either one of them. They were too tough for a neophyte. My playing skills have improved and if I had the space I would not mind owning either one of them. Especially TWD. If a TWD came around, I might even consider folding up one of my classic Sterns for space and bringing one in the house.
I already have two folded up and that are not for sale. I will just consider myself to be one who has to rotate.
Stern needs a pin that will attract the poorer players into the hobby. Munsters, IMO, turned out to be that pin. Sorry about that.